Res13 15294 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements mitigation fund established to pay for the reimbursement for cost of this improvement(estimated,based improvement costs on this EIR,to be 41 percent)at the time of that exceed the issuance of a building permit or,if the City applicanYs fair share. adds the improvement to its Traffic Impact Refer to Precise Fee Program(TIF)project list,the Plan, Chapter III, proposed project would mitigate its Capital contribution to this impact by paying its Improvements. Traffic Impact Fee in effect at time of payment and issuance of a building permit. ApplicanYs full funding or construction of the improvement,subject to potential reimbursement as provided in the Precise Plan,would also mitigate the projecYs contribution to this impact. or Mitigation 7-8(b). Mitigation of the Applicant fair share or City Prior to building projecYs impact at the intersection of payment of Traffic permit issuance that Charter Street and Bay Road would require Impact Fee would result in the conversion of the all-way stop 1,370,785 total controlled unsignalized intersection to a square feet in single-lane roundabout. Standard Precise Plan Blocks roundabouts are at least 110 feet in A-E. Refer to diameter. Smaller roundabouts may Stanford Precise operate efficiently down to 80 feet in Plan, Chapter IV, diameter. The existing intersection at Intersection Charter Street and Bay Road would allow Improvements Table. up to an 80-foot-diameter roundabout. If the design work shows that the 80-foot- If,at the time this diameter roundabout would not require the improvement is acquisition of additional right-of-way and required,the would not create additional safety hazards improvement has not for motorists, pedestrians,or bicyclists yet been constructed compared to Mitigation 7-8(a),and if and the City substantial evidence at the time the determines that other roundabout is proposed shows that the development has not roundabout would not divert traffic to other yet significantly intersections,the roundabout shall be contributed to the considered feasible and may be substituted need for the for Mitigation 7-8(a). With this improvement,then improvement,the level of service(LOS)at the applicant shall this intersection would improve to an fully fund or construct acceptable LOS B during the AM peak hour the improvement, and LOS C during the PM peak hour. subject to potential Page 6 v r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc RESO. 15294 MUFF#100