Res13 15294 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements Traffic from the proposed project would add reimbursement for 10.0 seconds to the PM peak hour delay at improvement costs this intersection over Near Term No Project that exceed the conditions(see EIR Table 7.11);other Near applicanYs fair share. Term growth would add 14.5 seconds to Refer to Precise the delay over Existing conditions. Plan, Chapter III, Therefore, it is assumed that the proposed Capital project would contribute approximately 41 Improvements. percent toward this impact. The proposed project would mitigate its contribution to this impact by contributing its fair share to a mitigation fund established to pay for the cost of this improvement(estimated,based on this EIR,to be 41 percent)at the time of issuance of a building permit or,if the City adds the roundabout to its Traffic Impact Fee Program(TIF)project list,the proposed project would mitigate its contribution to this impact by paying its Traffic Impact Fee in effect at time of payment and issuance of a building permit. ApplicanYs full funding or construction of the improvement,subject to potential reimbursement as provided in the Precise Plan,would also mitigate the projecYs contribution to this impact. Implementation of any one of these two mitigation options would reduce this project im act to a less-than-si nii►cant level. Impact 7-9: Near Term Plus Project Mitigation 7-9. Implement Mitigation 7-4 Applicant to fully fund. City Prior to building Impact on Douglas Avenue/Broadway (the project applicant would be responsible Applicant or City to permit issuance that Intersection. Under Near Term Plus Project for fully funding/completing the mitigation). construct. would result in conditions during the AM peak hour, project With these improvements,the level of 560,712 total square traffic would cause the intersection to service(LOS)at this intersection would feet in Precise Plan degrade from LOS C(21.9 seconds)to LOS improve to an acceptable LOS C during Blocks A-E. Refer to F(179.1 seconds). During the PM peak both peak hours,and the impact would be Stanford Precise hour,the intersection would continue to less-than-signii►cant. Plan, Chapter IV, operate at LOS F, but project traffic would Intersection cause the critical delay at the intersection to Improvements Table. increase from 54.5 seconds to 223.4 seconds (i.e.,by 168.9 seconds). In addition,this intersection would have peak hour volume increases large enough under both peak hours to satisfy the peak hour signal warrant. According to City guidelines,these changes constitute a signii►cant project impact. Page 7 � r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc RESO. 15294 MUFF#100