My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15294
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:50:36 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE STANFORD IN REDWOOD CITY PRECISE PLAN; ADOPTING CEQA FINDINGS; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 <br /> MONITORING VERIFICATION <br /> IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements <br /> issuance of a building permit would <br /> mitigate the proposed projecYs contribution <br /> to the significant cumulative impact. <br /> However,because this improvement would <br /> require Caltrans approval,the City of <br /> Redwood City cannot ensure the <br /> construction of this improvement. Without <br /> implementation of the proposed mitigation, <br /> the impact would be signii►cant and <br /> unavoidable. <br /> Impact 7-13: Cumulative With Project Mitigation 7-13. To mitigate the projecYs Applicant fair share or City to monitor in Prior to building <br /> Impact on Woodside Road/Bay Road contribution to the cumulative impact at the payment of Traffic consultation with permit issuance that <br /> Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project intersection of Woodside Road and Bay Impact Fee C/CAG&Caltrans would result in <br /> conditions during the PM peak hour,the Road,an additional westbound through 849,155 total square <br /> intersection would degrade from LOS D to lane would need to be added and the feet in Precise Plan <br /> LOS F,and the proposed project could shared through/right-turn lane converted to Blocks A-E. Refer to <br /> contribute up to 46.2 seconds of critical delay a right-turn lane. (Woodside Road is Stanford Precise <br /> to the intersection. According to the City of considered north-south and Bay Road is Plan, Chapter IV, <br /> Redwood City guidelines,this constitutes a considered east-west.) Traffic from the Intersection <br /> cumulatively considerable contribution to proposed project could add up to 46.2 Improvements Table. <br /> a signii►cant cumulative impact. seconds to the PM peak hour delay at this <br /> intersection over Cumulative No Project <br /> conditions(see EIR Table 7.16);other <br /> Cumulative growth could add up to 3.4 <br /> seconds to the delay over Near Term No <br /> Project conditions. The proposed project <br /> would contribute its fair share to a <br /> mitigation fund established to pay for the <br /> cost of this improvement(estimated,based <br /> on this EIR,to be 93 percent)at the time of <br /> issuance of a building permit or,if the City <br /> adds the improvement to its Traffic Impact <br /> Fee Program(TIF)project list,the <br /> proposed project would pay its Traffic <br /> Impact Fee in effect at time of payment and <br /> issuance of a building permit. <br /> The above improvements would be added <br /> to mitigation measures identified under <br /> Existing Plus Project conditions for the <br /> intersection of Woodside Road and Bay <br /> Road(Mitigation 7-2). The proposed <br /> projecYs payment of its fair share towards <br /> these improvements,and the City's <br /> implementation of the improvements,would <br /> mitigate the impact to a less-than- <br /> significantlevel. However, because these <br /> im rovements would re uire Caltrans <br /> Page 10 �� r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc <br /> RESO. 15294 <br /> MUFF#100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.