My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15294
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:50:36 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE STANFORD IN REDWOOD CITY PRECISE PLAN; ADOPTING CEQA FINDINGS; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 <br /> MONITORING VERIFICATION <br /> IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements <br /> approval,the City of Redwood City cannot <br /> ensure the construction of these <br /> improvements. Also,the additional <br /> westbound through lane would require <br /> additional right-of-way. Without <br /> implementation of the proposed <br /> improvements,the impact would be <br /> si nii►cant and unavoidable. <br /> Impact 7-14: Cumulative With Project Mitigation 7-14. This mitigation is in Applicant fair share or City to monitor in Prior to building <br /> Impact on Woodside Road/Middlefield addition to the Caltrans intersection payment of Traffic consultation with permit issuance that <br /> Road Intersection. Under Cumulative With improvement that will be implemented in Impact Fee C/CAG&Caltrans would result in <br /> Project conditions during the PM peak hour, 2013;a description of the 2013 715,189 total square <br /> the intersection would remain at LOS F,and improvement is included on page 7-21 of feet in Precise Plan <br /> the proposed project could contribute up to the Final EIR. Blocks A-E. Refer to <br /> 29.2 seconds of critical delay to the Stanford Precise <br /> intersection. According to City of Redwood To mitigate the significant cumulative Plan, Chapter IV, <br /> City guidelines,this constitutes a impact at the intersection of Woodside Intersection <br /> cumulatively considerable contribution to Road and Middlefield Road,an additional Improvements Table. <br /> a signii►cant cumulative impact. southbound through lane would need to be <br /> added to Woodside Road. (Woodside <br /> Road is considered north-south and <br /> Middlefield Road is considered east-west.) <br /> Because this intersection is subject to <br /> Caltrans jurisdiction,this roadway widening <br /> and any changes to the operation of the <br /> signal would require Caltrans approval. <br /> With these improvements,the level of <br /> service(LOS)at this intersection would <br /> remain at LOS F. Although LOS F still <br /> exceeds the City of Redwood City LOS <br /> standard,conditions with this mitigation <br /> would be better than under Cumulative No <br /> Project conditions. <br /> The widening of Woodside Road,inclusive <br /> of this intersection,is included in the City's <br /> Traffic Impact Fee Program(TIF)project <br /> list. However,there is no current design <br /> option that is acceptable to both Caltrans <br /> and the City of Redwood City;therefore, <br /> this improvement may be infeasible. If a <br /> design for widening Woodside Road can be <br /> developed which is acceptable to both <br /> Caltrans and the City of Redwood City, <br /> payment of the Traffic Impact Fee by the <br /> applicant would mitigate the proposed <br /> projecYs contribution to the significant <br /> cumulative impact to a less-than-significant <br /> Page 11 �� r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc <br /> RESO. 15294 <br /> MUFF#100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.