My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15294
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:50:36 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE STANFORD IN REDWOOD CITY PRECISE PLAN; ADOPTING CEQA FINDINGS; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 <br /> MONITORING VERIFICATION <br /> IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements <br /> level. If it is determined that the Woodside <br /> Road improvements remain infeasible <br /> because the improvements are not <br /> consistent with the New Redwood City <br /> General Plan and/or Caltrans policy,the <br /> cumulative impact would remain <br /> signii►cant and unavoidable,as would the <br /> proposed projecYs contribution to that <br /> cumulative im act. <br /> Impact 7-15: Cumulative With Project Mitigation 7-15. To mitigate the significant Applicant fair share or City Prior to building <br /> Impact on Douglas Avenue/Bay Road cumulative impact at the intersection of payment of Traffic permit issuance that <br /> Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project Douglas Avenue and Bay Road,the Impact Fee would result in <br /> conditions during the PM peak hour,the intersection would need to be signalized 759,845 total square <br /> intersection would degrade from LOS C to with protected phasing on the eastbound feet in Precise Plan <br /> LOS F,and the proposed project could and westbound approaches on Bay Road. Blocks A-E. Refer to <br /> contribute up to 78.2 seconds of critical delay In addition to signalization, both the Stanford Precise <br /> to the intersection. According to City of eastbound and westbound approaches Plan, Chapter IV, <br /> Redwood City guidelines,this constitutes a would need to be restriped to include a Intersection <br /> cumulatively considerable contribution to total of one left-turn lane and one shared Improvements Table. <br /> a signii►cant cumulative impact. through/right-turn lane on both the <br /> eastbound and westbound approaches. <br /> With these improvements the level of <br /> service(LOS)at this intersection would <br /> improve to an acceptable LOS C during the <br /> PM peak hour. <br /> Traffic from the proposed project could add <br /> up to 78.2 seconds to the PM peak hour <br /> delay at this intersection over Cumulative <br /> No Project conditions(see EIR Table 7.16); <br /> other Cumulative growth could add up to <br /> 11.9 seconds to the delay over Near Term <br /> No Project conditions. The proposed <br /> project would contribute its fair share to a <br /> mitigation fund established to pay for the <br /> cost of this improvement(estimated,based <br /> on this EIR,to be 87 percent)at the time of <br /> issuance of a building permit or,if the City <br /> adds the improvement to its Traffic Impact <br /> Fee Program(TIF)project list,the <br /> proposed project would pay its Traffic <br /> Impact Fee in effect at time of payment and <br /> issuance of a building permit. <br /> The proposed projecYs payment of its fair <br /> share toward these improvements would <br /> mitigate the projecYs contribution to the <br /> Page 12 �2 r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc <br /> RESO. 15294 <br /> MUFF#100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.