Res13 15294 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements cumulative impact to a less-than- si nii►cant level. Impact 7-16: Cumulative With Project Mitigation 7-16. To mitigate the Applicant fair share or City Prior to building Impact on Douglas Avenue/Middlefield cumulative impact at the intersection of payment of Traffic permit issuance that Road Intersection. Under Cumulative With Douglas Avenue and Middlefield Road,the Impact Fee would result in Project conditions during the AM peak hour, eastbound and westbound approaches 1,478,743 total the intersection would degrade from LOS D would need to be modified from permitted square feet in to LOS E,and the proposed project could phasing to protected phasing. (Douglas Precise Plan Blocks contribute up to 10.6 seconds of critical delay Avenue is considered north-south and A-E. Refer to to the intersection. According to City of Middlefield Road is considered east-west.) Stanford Precise Redwood City guidelines,this constitutes a With these improvements,the level of Plan, Chapter IV, cumulatively considerable contribution to service(LOS)at this intersection would Intersection a signii►cant cumulative impact. improve to acceptable LOS D during the Improvements Table. AM peak hour. Traffic from the proposed project could add up to 10.6 seconds to the AM peak hour delay at this intersection over Cumulative No Project conditions(see EIR Table 7.16); other Cumulative growth could add up to 35.8 seconds to the delay over Near Term No Project conditions. The proposed project would contribute its fair share to a mitigation fund established to pay for the cost of this improvement(estimated,based on this EIR,to be 23 percent)at the time of issuance of a building permit or,if the City adds the improvement to its Traffic Impact Fee Program(TIF)project list,the proposed project would pay its Traffic Impact Fee in effect at time of payment and issuance of a building permit. The proposed projecYs payment of its fair share toward these improvements would mitigate the projecYs contribution to the cumulative impact to a less-than- signii►cant level. Impact 7-17: Cumulative With Project Mitigation 7-17. To mitigate the significant Applicant fair share or City Prior to building Impact on 2nd Avenue/Broadway cumulative impact at the intersection of 2nd payment of Traffic permit issuance that Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project Avenue and Broadway,the intersection Impact Fee would result in conditions during the AM peak hour,the would need to be signalized. With this 1,419,857 total intersection would remain at LOS F,and the improvement,the level of service(LOS)at square feet in proposed project could contribute up to 6.7 this intersection would improve to an Precise Plan Blocks seconds of critical delay to the intersection. acceptable LOS C during the AM peak A-E. Refer to According to City of Redwood City guidelines, hour. Stanford Precise this constitutes a cumulatively considerable Plan, Chapter IV, Page 13 �3 r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc RESO. 15294 MUFF#100