My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res19 15780
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res19 15780
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 8:01:53 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 8:01:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
6/24/2019
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY APPROVING THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISION C.3.J OF THE MUNICIPAL REGIONAL PERMIT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REDWOOD CITY <br />Cohesive Sediment <br />17.6% Reduction <br />Total PCBs <br />17.6% Reduction <br />Total Savings <br />(Sediment vs. PC8s) <br />GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN <br />Total Savings <br />(lurisdictionalvs. Countywide) <br />Scenario 1 <br />Scenario 2 <br />4 <br />Savings <br />Scenario 3 <br />Scenario 4 <br />4 <br />Savings <br />Savings Savings <br />The following factors are considered for each model scenario: <br />y Overall <br />Savings <br />• Load Reduction Objective -With a cohesive sediment load reduction <br />objective, Scenarios 1 and 2 represent the most conservative <br />approaches. Those scenarios assume that given the uncertainties <br />about PCB source areas, targeting an overall 17.6% load reduction of <br />cohesive sediment in general (silts and clays) achieves the PCB load <br />reduction objective for GI. Scenarios 3 and 4 assume that PCB <br />sources are spatially distributed based on analysis of land use types. <br />The cost -benefit optimization process targets those areas as having <br />the highest likelihood of PCB sources. Scenarios 3 and 4 highlight the <br />potential cost savings (relative to Scenarios 1 and 2) that could be <br />realized if PCB sources are identified and targeted for GI <br />implementation. <br />• Jurisdictional verses Countywide - There are many possible ways to <br />achieve a 17.6% load reduction for all of San Mateo County. The <br />"Jurisdictional" approach stipulates that each jurisdiction must <br />individually achieve at least a 17.6% load reduction based on the <br />population -based wasteload reduction for each jurisdiction. <br />Conversely, the "Countywide" approach achieves the 17.6% load <br />reduction countywide by allowing the model to allocate the <br />countywide wasteload reduction via GI across jurisdictional <br />boundaries. The countywide approach can provide significant cost <br />savings over the jurisdictional approach, especially where pollutant <br />sources are spatially concentrated. Figure 1 conceptually illustrates <br />the jurisdictional versus countywide optimization approaches. <br />Where there is cooperation among jurisdictions, results from these <br />two scenarios can provide a useful analytical framework for cost- <br />sharing and implementation of the most cost-effective management <br />scenarios. <br />RWC GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN <br />18 JUNE 2019 <br />ATTY/RESO.0075/CC RESO APPROVING THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN — EXHIBITA RESO. NO. 15780 <br />REV: 06-20-19 PR MUFF NO. 802 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.