Laserfiche WebLink
06/07/2004 <br />Both the Proposed Project and Alternative 6 set maximum Peninsula <br />Marina Area building heights at 205 feet. However, unlike the Proposed Project, <br />Alternative 6 also limits average building heights to 14 stories, or approximately 140 <br />feet. This additional development standard substantially reduces the total number of <br />housing units that can be developed and, consequently, prevents the Project from <br />reaching fundamental housing production objectives. For this reason, Alternative 6 is <br />not a feasible alternative to the Proposed Project. <br />G. Reduced Residential and Increased Commercial, Plus Reduced <br />Building Heights and Reduced Marina Fill (Alternative 7) <br />Description: Alternative 7 assumes development of a mixed use <br />residential - commercial complex similar to the Initial Project, but with approximately one - <br />third fewer residential units and two- thirds more commercial floor area. Alternative 7 <br />would include 1,300 condominium residential units for sale (as compared to 1,930 for <br />the proposed Project) and 535,000 square feet of commercial floor area, including <br />approximately 17,000 square feet of convenience retail. The layout for Alternative 7 <br />includes more marina fill (10.8 acres as compared to 10 acres for the Project) and a <br />reduction in residential building intensity and height with eleven multi -story residential <br />structures (as compared to thirteen multi -story residential structures for the proposed <br />Project) and a maximum building height of 205 feet as compared to 230 -235 feet for the <br />Project. <br />Findings: As compared to the Project, Alternative 7 would result in <br />reduced, but still significant, impacts in the areas of [land use, visual impacts, and] <br />biological resources. Transportation and circulation impacts would be slightly increased <br />as compared to the Project. Impacts in the areas of hydrology and water quality, <br />infrastructure and public services, soils and geology, public health and safety, noise, <br />cultural resources, and air quality would be similar to those of the proposed Project. <br />With respect to population, housing and employment, Alternative 7 would have a less <br />positive effect on the existing citywide imbalance between jobs and employed residents. <br />Alternative 7 would only partially attain most basic Project objectives. In particular, it <br />would result in substantially fewer residential units, thus preventing the Project from <br />attaining the basic objectives of addressing the demand for housing and providing <br />affordable housing options. Based on the foregoing and the discussion in Section 17.7 <br />of the FEIR, the City finds that, on balance, the Project would provide substantially <br />greater public benefits than Alternative 7 and that Alternative 7 is not a feasible <br />alternative to the Project. <br />H. Reduced Commercial to Permit No Marina Fill (Alternative 8) <br />Description: Alternative 8 assumes development of the Project site with <br />a residential - commercial complex with similar uses to the Project, but with a reduction in <br />the scope of the development to eliminate all of the approximately 9.8 acres of marina <br />fill associated with the Project. Alternative 8 also includes a reduction in the maximum <br />residential structure height to 190 feet, as compared to the 230 -235 feet maximum <br />residential structure height for the Project, and a reduction in the number of multi -story <br />1289 \02 \179278.2 40 <br />Atty /Reso /Reso.1470 14590 <br />060804 Muff # 304 Bin 26 <br />