Laserfiche WebLink
7C <br /> Page 52 <br /> 1. All buiidings more than 75 feet above the lowest level of RCFD vehicle <br /> access (elass�ed "high-rise" buildings) shall have approved cambination <br /> automatic fire sprinklers installpd; a secondary on-site water supply, in <br /> addition to an approved primary water supply capable of supplying the <br /> required fire flaw; a standby power-generator set; and two remotely located <br /> Fire Department connections. <br /> 2. Fire hydrants shall be provided along required fire apparatus roads and <br /> adjacent public streets in conformance with the Unifarm Buifding Code. <br /> 3. On-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow <br /> (5,000 gallons per minute) shall be provided when any portion of a building or <br /> facility is in excess of 15�feet from a water suppiy on a public street. <br /> 4. Fire apparatus access raads shall be provided when any portion of a building <br /> or facility is located more than '150 feet from fire apparatus access as <br /> measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building ar facility. <br /> No point in a sfructure shall be more than 150 feet away fram an access point <br /> (such that fire hoses do not have to extend over 150 feet}. <br /> 5. Piers, wharves, or floats more than 250 feet from fire apparatus access shall <br /> be provided with an approved wet standpipe system. <br /> The City may consider other alternafives to these requirements if it determines that such <br /> alternafives are feasible and such access will no#jeopardize emergency response. <br /> Findings: Implementation of #hese measures is feasible and would reduce this <br /> impact ta a less-fhan-significanf level. <br /> G. Emerqencv Access Impacts <br /> �otential Impact 10-7: The project has the potential to conflict with RCF� <br /> standards for road design {e.g., 20 feet af unabstructed width and 45-fooU22-foot minimum <br /> outside and inside turning radii, respectively). Any potential conflicts with RCFD road design <br /> standards cauld cause emergency access deficiencies, representing a potenfially significant <br /> impacf. <br /> Mitigation 10-7: As a condition of tentative subdivision map approval, require <br /> {a) City review and approval of the proposed tentative subdivision map, and (b) demonstratian <br /> by the applicant that tne project complies with all applicable City and RCFD raad design and <br /> emergency access standards. The City rr�ay consider other al#ernatives to these requirements if <br /> it determines that such alternatives are feasible and such access wiil not jeopardize emergency <br /> response. <br /> Findings: Implementation of this measure is feasible and waufd reduce the <br /> impact to a less-fhan-signi�canf level. <br /> AttylResolReso.1772 31 <br /> 121307 <br />