Laserfiche WebLink
7C <br /> Page 62 <br /> XI. CULTURAL AN� HlSTORIC RESOURCES <br /> A. Disturbance of Prehistoric Cultura[ Resources <br /> Potential lmpact 14-1: Implementation of the praposed project grading plan, <br /> including subsurface foundafions, dredging, roads and in€rastructure, cauld disturb as yet <br /> unidentifed sensitive, on-site, subsurtace, cultural resources. This potential represents a <br /> patentrally significanf impact. <br /> Mitigation 14-1: Require that a qualified archaeologist be retained at applicant <br /> expense to monitor project-related an-site building foundation, marina, infrastructure, and other <br /> �xca�aiions. in the event that su�surface cu[turaf resources are encountered during approved <br /> graund-disturbing activities, work in the immediate vicinity must be stopped and the retained <br /> archaeologist shall evaluate the finds. The discovery or disturbance of any cultural resources <br /> sha{I aiso be reported ta the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS} and <br /> #he Native American Heritage Commission. Identified cultural resourccs shalf be recorded on <br /> State Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) form 422 (archaeological sites). Mitigation <br /> measures prescribed by these groups and required by the City shall be undertaken prior to <br /> resumption of canstruction activities. Ef disturbance of a project area cultural resource cannot be <br /> avoided, a mitigation program, including measures set forth in the City's Cultural Resources <br /> Management Program anc! in compiiance wi#h sections 15064.4 and 15126.4 of the CEQA <br /> Guidelines, shall be implemented. In the event that any human remains are encountered, <br /> earthmoving shall be stopped untif the County Coroner's office has been contacted. <br /> Findings: Implementation flf Mitigation 14-1 wiii reduce the significance of the <br /> Project's potential impact to cuftural and historic resources to a less-than-significan# level. <br /> XI1. AIR QUALITY <br /> A. Construction Emissions <br /> Po#ential Impact 15-1: Project construction activities, inc(uding proposed <br /> building demalition, excavation and grading operations, and filling and dredging, associated <br /> construction vehicle traffic, and wind blowing over resultant exposed earth, would generate <br /> exhaust emissians and fugitive particula±e matter emissio!�s that would affe�t loca! air qGality. <br /> These possible effects represents a potentrally signifrcanf impacf. <br /> MifiEga�ion 'l5-1: Dust emissions fram demolition and construction activities can <br /> be greatly redueed by impiementing fugitive dust control measures. The significance of <br /> construction impacts is, according to the BAAQMD Guidefines, determined by whether or nat <br /> appropriate ciust control measures are implemented. <br /> Implementation of the following conventional BAAQMD-recommended dust contra! measures <br /> would be expected to reduce this impact to a less-than-signifrcanf level: <br /> 1. Demolitian Period. Require implementation of the following dust con#rol <br /> measures by contractors during d�molition of existing structur2s: <br /> AttylResolReso.1772 41 <br /> 121307 <br />