Laserfiche WebLink
7.C. - Page 39 of 178 <br />C. Evaluation of Alternatives Selected for Analysis <br />The alternatives selected for further detailed review within the EIR focus on alternatives that could the Project's <br />significant environmental impacts, while still meeting most of the basic Project objectives. Those alternatives are <br />discussed below. <br />No Project Alternative <br />Description: Under the No Project Alternative, the project site could remain, as it is today — developed with the <br />existing VMSC, Sid Herkner Pool, and NFL Alumni Association building. <br />Comparison to the Project: The No Project Alternative would avoid all of the project's environmental impacts and <br />traffic calming benefits that would result from the implementation of the proposed project. The No Project Alternative <br />would not meet any of the project objectives of replacing the aging VMSC (objective 1), forming a partnership with <br />the YMCA (objective 2), providing a new YMCA facility (objective 3), providing year-round aquatics (objective 4), <br />expanding health and wellness opportunities (objective 5), providing a community facility with multiple recreation <br />opportunities for all (objective 6), providing a new public promenade (objective 7), providing a new public facility <br />that could provide shelter in the event of an emergency (objective 9), and implementing traffic calming measures near <br />the park (objective 10). <br />Finding: The No Project Alternative would avoid all of the project's environmental impacts and traffic calming <br />benefits, but would not meet any of the project objectives. For the foregoing reason, the No Project Alternative is <br />hereby rejected. <br />Preservation Alternative <br />Description: Under the Preservation Alternative, the proposed VMSC would be constructed as proposed and the <br />proposed YMCA would involve the preservation of historic portions of the existing VMSC building and setting and <br />construction of a new addition to the preserved portion of the existing VMSC building. <br />Instead of demolishing the entire VMSC building to construct the proposed YMCA, the VMSC building would be <br />retained and preserved except for the southern (theater) wing, which can be demolished without substantially affecting <br />the historic integrity of the building. In addition, no new construction would be located on the lawn and open space <br />areas immediately north and west of the VMSC building. Rehabilitation and new construction would occur to meet <br />the total proposed square footage of 35,000 square feet for the YMCA and would adhere to the following measures: <br />• Prior to issuance of site or construction permits related directly to the Veterans Memorial Building, proposed <br />plans for the rehabilitation of those buildings would be submitted to the Redwood City Community <br />Development Department for review and approval. Any exterior alterations would be conducted in accordance <br />with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and undertaken with the assistance of a historic <br />preservation architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Standards Professional Qualifications Standards. <br />The historic preservation architect shall regularly evaluate the ongoing renovation to ensure it continues to <br />satisfy the Standards. The historic preservation architect would submit status reports to the Redwood City <br />Community Development Department according to a schedule agreed upon prior to commencement of the <br />work. <br />• Prior to issuance of site or construction permits, proposed plans for new construction on site shall be submitted <br />to the Redwood City Community Development Department for review and approval. Said permits shall only <br />be issued after it has been confirmed that the design of the new construction is in conformance with the <br />ATTY/RESO.0124/CC RESO RECOMMENDING CEQA CERTIFICATION -YMCA <br />REV: 12-12-19 IY <br />Page 22 of 44 <br />462 <br />