Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 40 of 45 <br />• Need to get the word out about public dumping sites. <br />• Mobile shower/laundry, access to sewer cleanouts, can give vouchers. <br />• "Bad apples" are making it hard for other RV residents. <br />• Can use sewer hookups. <br />• Can use job training and find ways to fit into the Bay Area economy <br />• Causes of "bad apple" behavior can often be drug use or mental health challenges. <br />• Can give people bus passes, vouchers, mental health services, coupons. <br />• Someone approached an RV resident offering a give a gift card in exchange for filling out a <br />"survey" but never returned with the gift card. Got the RV resident's information. <br />• Other challenges: shaky train, 101noise. <br />• Question about people having to move their RVs at 7:00 am — what would make it feel safer? <br />• RV resident has to be up at 4:00 am to get to his job. It's a hardship to have to move his RV at <br />that hour. <br />• Long-term parking site? Goal is to focus services — like a homeless shelter for RVs. <br />• Would be a real hardship to have to move an RV every night. Would have to leave Redwood City <br />if the req. were every 24 hours. Would prefer 72 hours. <br />• Redwood City wants people to migrate to permanent housing. One RV resident is open to that. <br />• RV resident moves his vehicle daily and still gets stickers. <br />• People who need to stay in RVs would like 72 hours. <br />• The East Palo Alto program requires a sticker that vets them even to be on the street. <br />• Maybe a vetting process would help to get services to people with challenges. <br />• RV resident is on Austin St. (?) near Convention St. to avoid street cleaning. <br />• RV resident would like a permit to stay on Stafford St. and would be willing to pay $200/mo. <br />• Some neighbors are concerned about the visual issue and safety fears. <br />• RV residents say their RVs are providing a sound break (laughter). <br />• What would make permanent housing affordable? <br />• RV resident who works in Redwood City spends $500/mo. on housing in another city. <br />• RV resident says $2,400 would be too much; there's no commuter solution that matches his <br />experience and desire for privacy. <br />• In San Mateo, someone's rent went from $2,800 to $3,900/mo. plus having to pay for parking <br />space. RV costs $250/mo.; even worth dealing with extremes of temperature in winter and <br />summer and thin walls. <br />• RV resident would like to have a permanent solution to avoid having to "move my house every <br />three days." <br />• Would building more RV parks be a good solution? <br />• Yes, RV parks have the amenities, but would fill up fast. In Pacifica, have short-term and long- <br />term spaces ($500/mo.). Hard to get! <br />• RV resident offered 6 mos. cash up front to get the space. <br />• How can big tech companies offer something for RV residents? Space for affordable housing, <br />attracting younger residents, making it desirable. Seeing a video on YouTube got him interested <br />in RVs. How to look at it as a positive. "Tiny homes." Jobs. <br />• In marketing terms, people are looking for an atypical housing "product." For example, "micro- <br />units." <br />• Create 50 RV spaces at $500/mo. with strict rules for "bad apples" and make the consequence <br />that if one violates the rules, all have to leave. <br />• Liability with such spaces can be a big challenge. <br />430 <br />