My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-09-21 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-09-21 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2020 6:18:07 PM
Creation date
9/17/2020 6:17:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/21/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
9/17/2020 6:18 PM
Modified:
9/17/2020 6:18 PM
Text:
http://www.redwoodcity.org/
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9.A. - Page 25 of 34 <br />The survey asked respondents to provide a weighted rank identifying what was important to consider <br />when adopting Reach Codes (Table 2). The most highly weighted priority in adopting Reach Codes is to <br />reduce GHGs. <br />Table 2 <br />While reducing GHGs ranked as the most important consideration, as Table 3 shows, the respondents <br />seemed to rely on a wider range of considerations in deciding which exceptions should be allowed. For <br />example, respondents appeared to generally favor exceptions if Reach Codes requirements could impact <br />certain business' fiscal operations. Additionally, Table 3 shows respondents were generally not in favor of <br />exempting affordable housing developments, even though preserving and incentivizing affordable <br />housing was the second ranked priority, as shown in Table 2. <br />Table 3 <br /># <br />Importance of Reducing Greenhouse Gas <br />Percent <br />Emissions <br />1 <br />Importance of Preserving/Incentivizing <br />Percent <br />Affordable Housing <br />2 <br />Importance of Availability of Cost Competitive <br />Equipment <br />3 <br />Importance of Cost of Construction <br />4 <br />Importance of Cost of Changing Business <br />Practices <br />5 <br />While reducing GHGs ranked as the most important consideration, as Table 3 shows, the respondents <br />seemed to rely on a wider range of considerations in deciding which exceptions should be allowed. For <br />example, respondents appeared to generally favor exceptions if Reach Codes requirements could impact <br />certain business' fiscal operations. Additionally, Table 3 shows respondents were generally not in favor of <br />exempting affordable housing developments, even though preserving and incentivizing affordable <br />housing was the second ranked priority, as shown in Table 2. <br />Table 3 <br />Page 5 of 14 <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.org <br />127 <br /># <br />Supported Exceptions <br />Percent <br /># <br />Non -Supported <br />Percent <br />Approve <br />Exceptions <br />Reject <br />Space <br />Projects with Planning <br />1 <br />Conditioning/Water <br />57% <br />5 <br />60% <br />Heating - Hospitals <br />Entitlements <br />Space <br />Conditioning/Water <br />Affordable Housing <br />2 <br />Heating - Scientific <br />54% <br />6 <br />Developments <br />51% <br />Laboratory Areas <br />Restaurants/Kitchens - <br />Cooking <br />3 <br />Non-residential <br />57% <br />11 <br />Appliances/Fireplaces - <br />54% <br />Buildings <br />Residential Buildings <br />Page 5 of 14 <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.org <br />127 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.