My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-10-26 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-10-26 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 1:04:03 PM
Creation date
10/22/2020 5:08:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/26/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
10/28/2020 3:34 PM
Modified:
10/28/2020 3:34 PM
Text:
mailto:denneboomer@gmail.com
ID:
2
Creator:
Created:
10/28/2020 3:34 PM
Modified:
10/28/2020 3:34 PM
Text:
mailto:council@redwoodcity.org
ID:
3
Creator:
Created:
10/28/2020 3:34 PM
Modified:
10/28/2020 3:34 PM
Text:
mailto:mdiaz@redwoodcity.org
ID:
4
Creator:
Created:
10/28/2020 3:34 PM
Modified:
10/28/2020 3:34 PM
Text:
mailto:DHoward@redwoodcity.org
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
878
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: chris dennebaum <br />To: GRP -City Council; MGR -Melissa Stevenson Diaz; Council -Diane Howard <br />Subject: Temporary closure of Engine 9 <br />Date: Monday, October 26, 2020 2:36:42 PM <br />Hello, <br />It has come to my attention that Redwood City plans to temporarily close engine 9 due to <br />budget cuts. While I of course understand that times are difficult, and that adjustments need to <br />be made, this reduction in service is not one that should be enacted. <br />As a San Carlos homeowner with a young family, one might ask why we are writing to <br />Redwood City officials. Quite simply it is because this decision results in a greatly reduced <br />level of service and protection for my family. Taking one of the busiest engines in the county <br />and replacing it with a truck company seems at first blush to be a good option. If you look <br />deeper at what effect it will have, you might see things differently. If Truck 9 is to handle all <br />the medical calls from this busy engine, it will not be regularly available to respond to our <br />residence. In the case of a fire, any delay in search, rescue or ventilation can have a <br />devastating effect. Another very real problem is the question of what coverage issues this <br />move will cause. When Truck 9 is running medical calls in downtown, will Engines 13 and 16 <br />(which respond to our home) be moved up to cover? If one of my children were choking or I <br />suddenly collapsed in cardiac arrest, how much additional time would it take for the next <br />engine company to arrive to render aid? Those additional seconds and minutes could be an <br />eternity in a critical situation and cost my family greatly. <br />Finally, this issue was addressed by Measure RR in 2018. As you know, that measure passed a <br />1/2% sales tax increase which was sold to the public as protecting rapid 911 response times. <br />I'm not sure where that money was allocated, but if it was not to keep these resources on the <br />street then why was this measure passed in overwhelming fashion? The people of Redwood <br />City (and San Carlos) do not care about administrative positions, what they care about is the <br />amount of time it takes to get the help we need. If the money voted for in measure RR is being <br />used for anything but keeping public safety resources on the street, those things need to go <br />before Engine 9 is closed. Please reconsider the decision to close Engine 9 and find another <br />way. My family depends on it. <br />Thank you for reading, <br />Chris Dennebaum <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.