Laserfiche WebLink
6.D. - Page 84 of 179 <br />procedures reflect desired levels of cost effective application and efficient system <br />operation. The detailed policies and procedures presume the premise that the most <br />appropriate BWC system for the RCPD was in place. The written directives take full <br />advantage of BWC systems that incorporate CAD and RMS integration, use the highest <br />levels of existing camera and audio capture technology as well as future advancements <br />in technology, and automatic camera activation capabilities. <br />1.3 Policy and Procedure Approval: <br />The implementation of a BWC system will have a direct impact on a change in working <br />conditions that Labor (POA and PSA) will need to feel comfortable with for the program <br />to be successful from day one. Early in the development of the internal BWC <br />committee, labor has taken part in the discussions or kept informed about the <br />potentiality for implementing a BWC system and the governing policies for its use. Input <br />from the District Attorney and approval on how they will receive BWC evidence for court <br />prosecutions has also been vetted for their initial approval with more detailed <br />discussions to follow. <br />1.4 Equipment Evaluation (RFI): <br />Obviously one of the most critical aspects of a BWC implementation program is the <br />selection of the camera equipment and video/audio capture management software. <br />Equipment selection balanced with immediate and long-term cost considerations and <br />operational functionality under the philosophy of best value purchasing can form a <br />certain degree of predictable success of the program. Inversely, the purchase of the <br />wrong equipment has the potential to derail the effective and efficient long-term <br />integration of any BWC system. <br />Typical to the outreach done when collecting BWC policies and procedures from other <br />departments that helped inform the current governing RCPD policies and procedures, <br />so was the case in a review of deployed BWC systems. As you would expect in any <br />technology purchase consideration, there is an array of products available to meet the <br />varied needs of end-user requirements. One of the most glaring inefficiencies <br />experienced by agencies early to deploy BWC systems was the labor involved in <br />labeling captured video evidence and video review periods to document the contents in <br />a written report accurately. A local bay area county agency who was early to deploy a <br />BWC solution experienced end -of -shift overtime related to tagging and viewing the <br />videos at the station on an average of 1-112 hours per officer. The immediate solution <br />and one copied by other agencies we reviewed were to issue computerized phones to <br />all officers and pair the two devices together. The, now mandatory, phone solution <br />allows officers to correctly 'tag' the video at the end of each recording event and <br />complete reports incrementally throughout the shift, instead of waiting until the end of <br />shift to review the video on the station computer. It will be with this understanding and <br />other considerations that we will approach the selection of the appropriate BWC system. <br />1.5 Data Storage Method Selection: <br />There are two types of data storage solutions available when selecting a viable BWC <br />solution. One is internal storage managed and maintained by City IT staff and budgets, <br />and the other is external or cloud -based storage purchased annually on the <br />Department's budget as part of an integrated BWC and data management system. <br />Either solution has its Inherent unique costs and limitations to be considered. Integral to <br />choosing between the two will be the ease of use by the officer and additional end users <br />of the system who share in using BWC evidence, i.e., judicial courts, case investigating <br />123 <br />