AgdaPkt 2008-04-14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Charles Jany, Principal Planner, presented the staff report (slide presentation on fite). He exptamed that the texture is the main issue and it how staff considered this a policy decision. Mr. Jany provided details about the proposed roof and the overall project. The appellant/applicant, Dr. Willard E. Fee Jr. and Patricia Cunningham, were invited to address the CounciL Dr. Fee asked that Council accept the requested roof as an architectural and functional element. He asked Council to have a change in its mindset. Dr. Fee explained the solar panels he plans to install. He shared a sample of the material he wants to use and provided details on it. Ms. Cunningham addressed Council and explained her outreach to neighbors. Eugene Sakai, the architect, who designed the project, spoke about the proposed design and the roof lines as well the overall look and feel of the area. Mr. Sakai mentioned the Frank Uoyd Wright design as one that fits the area. The appellant/applicant made comments about other jurisdictions and how he finds this to be a reasonable request. Mayor Foust opened the public hearing. There was no public comment. M/S Ira/Hartnett to close the public hearing. Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. The notification process was discussed and staff clarified that within a 300-foot radius neighbors were notified. Mr. Jany responded to questions by Council and said that the issue is not the color but its appearance. Jill Ekas, Planning Manager, provided details on the notification timing. Mayor Foust stated that for future cases the notification to the applicant/appellant needs to be improved. Staff explained that an anonymous protest was received. Blake Lion, Zoning Administrator, clarified that the issue of metal roofs was taken to the Architectural Review Commission as a general discussion topic. Staff responded to questions from Council and requested Council direction on this issue. Council discussed issues related to neighborhood, the implications of this proposal and the fact that this is an area where the architectural character is changing. Staff responded to questions about the other elements of the proposal. Council discussed the transition that some neighborhoods are going through, and how the issue of neighborhood compatibility might be chaltenging. The appHcant responded to Council questions about the placement of the solar panels. The reflective nature of the roof was discussed. Staff expressed its concerns with the reflectivity. Mr. Sakai answered questions regarding the paint finish. The architect Mr. Sakai proposed a condition to address the reflectivity. Mayor Foust stated that it is important to be adaptive and receptive to change. She believes that this house adds some value to the neighborhood and she supports this action. The matter was also referred back to the Architectural Review Committed for a discussion. Staff explained that it will be supportive and act on JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2008 PAGE 7