AgdaPkt 2021.01.25 Amended Joint SA PFA

Browse Search

6.C. - Page 26 of 34 Stylized Diagrams — Overlays themes of information and uses false color to highlight key elements. This approach helps unite complex land use and transportation policies to physical places. Maptionnaire—This versatile tool allows participants to provide comments at a geographic level. In addition to adding pins to a map and providing site specific comments, the consultant uses Maptionnaire to discuss land use changes at a district or focus area level, with imagery representing different types of densities and building types. This tool has been expanded with a budgeting/ estimating tool; the consultant uses this tool to help each participant weigh in on where a City's RHNA allocation should be focused. Phases of Engagement Working through three phases of engagement, the consultant and City will build toward a community -supported General Plan Amendment for adoption hearings. Phase I: Community Value Statement—With the community, the City and the consultant will seek to establish overarching values and priorities in the Housing Element planning process. These values should include a strong emphasis on discussing equity, environmental sustainability and justice, and current City Council Strategic Priorities, as well as other community priorities. The intent is to create a set of criteria that can be used to rank various land use strategies. The Housing and Human Concerns Committee will be involved with this value -setting. Phase II: Education of Process with Discussion of Preliminary Strategies — the consultant will help the community to become informed and engaged on overall Housing Element requirements and start the discussion of preliminary land use strategies identified in Task 4. Fehr & Peers will support select public engagement strategies to communicate transportation considerations for the preliminary land use strategies. These strategies will also be presented to the Housing and Human Concerns Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council for discussion and direction. During this phase, strategies to address environmental justice concerns should also be addressed. Phase III: Distribution of Preferred Strategy — Based on the discussion of the preliminary strategies, a preferred strategy will be developed for distribution and discussion. In conjunction with these three phases of engagement, the CEC1A process will include required Environmental Review Noticing and Events. The consultant will provide materials for required environmental meetings, including the scoping meeting and comments on the Draft EIR, as described in Task 7. The consultant will provide options for creative methods to efficiently collect public comments and provide responses in the Final EIR, including online comment forms and integration within the larger community engagement program. Meetings For the purposes of budgeting, the following meetings are assumed. These meetings are subject to change based on recommendations in the Community Engagement Strategy/PEP (Task 1.3). Of note, the consultant recommends that meetings to discuss Environmental Justice needs and solutions take place within and accessible to disadvantaged communities, consistent with best practices identified by the Attorney General. Optional meetings listed in the table below may be focused on environmental justice. REV: 01-11-2021 PR ATTY/AGR.2020.086/MIG (Moore, lacofano Goltsman. Inc.) (Page 22 of 30) 125