My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt08 Kennedy Jenk Consultants
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
Agmt08 Under $60K
>
Agmt08 Kennedy Jenk Consultants
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2014 3:04:27 PM
Creation date
5/20/2008 1:21:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Kennedy Jenks
PROJECT NAME
Recycled Water Storage and Pumping System
Date
5/16/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Task 2.A.3: Coordination Support for DPS Pump Testing <br /> During the 1 October 2007 meeting, an operational testing and monitoring program was <br /> recommended to identify potential issues with the DPS pumps when operating below the <br /> specified minimum speeds. <br /> As described above, the reduced operating speeds being contemplated to improve the DPS <br /> operational performance (in terms of pump stage overlap) are not part of Flowserve's published <br /> guidelines. However, based on Kennedy/Jenks' coordination with Flowserve on this issue, <br /> there is good indication from their technical staff that that operation at these speeds should be <br /> acceptable. Flowserve staff have indicated they are available to assist with verifying acceptable <br /> operation after the programming revisions are made. <br /> Task 2.A.3 involves testing of the DPS pump operation following modifications to the <br /> programming (completed as part of Task 2.A.2) and comparision to the baseline data (described <br /> as part of Task 2.A.1). We recommend the City follow through with this testing, as discussed at <br /> the 1 October 2007 meeting, to provide verification that the control logic modifications provide <br /> the desired operation. We also recommend that Flowserve staff have an opportunity to observe <br /> the pump performance testing and to provide their input regarding any concerns over possible <br /> adverse pump wear or damage under the revised operating conditions. <br /> We anticipate that City's operational staff would coordinate with the pump service firms to <br /> schedule Flowserve's participation and to conduct the testing itself. We propose to offer the <br /> follow support services under Task 2A.3: <br /> a. Develop the testing and evaluation outline for use by the City in developing the testing <br /> plan. <br /> b. Participate in one (1) day of on-site testing. <br /> c. Collate and interpret the testing data, included comparison to baseline data and <br /> feedback from Flowserve. The results would be documented in a short field memo to be <br /> submitted to the City. <br /> B. Distribution Box Gate Control <br /> The City has not provided us with guidance whether engineering support services are needed, <br /> and we have not included an estimate of effort associated with this warranty item. If the City <br /> requests Kennedy/Jenks' support, we will submit a request for additional authorization before <br /> work proceeds. <br /> C. Design Criteria for Current and Future SBSA Recycled Water Demand <br /> You have asked us to defer work on this item. We understand SBSA is successfully receiving <br /> flow to the Landscape Impoundment (LI) through the original First Step Project distribution <br /> pipeline. Since flow to the LI passes through the DPS flow meter, no control logic modifications <br /> are required at this time to ensure stable DPS operations. <br /> We also understand that SBSA will not be requesting recycled water through the 12-inch supply <br /> line, which is currently fitted with a blind flange, for at least 2 years. At the end of that time, it <br /> will be necessary to install the designated future flowmeter on the 12-inch supply line and <br /> incorporate that signal into the DPS control logic. It may be efficient and desirable to include the <br /> PLC/PanelView programming changes necessary for the added flowmeter signal into the <br /> revisions being made as part of Task 2.A.2. However, no effort has been estimated or included <br /> in the current proposal for this warranty item. <br /> Please note that Task 2 does not include development of a status report at the end of the <br /> specified work period summarizing accomplishments. <br /> Agreement over$10K 13 <br /> City Attorney Approved Version 111803 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.