Laserfiche WebLink
<br />78 <br />Page 26 <br /> <br />Table 6 . Major Findings for Allied <br /> <br />Qualifications and Exoerience <br />. The company has been providing collection service to the SBWMA service area for <br />decades and currently provides similar services to two other San Mateo County <br />communities and twelve other jurisdictions in Northern California. The company is the <br />second largest solid waste company in the United States with approximately 24,000 <br />employees and is based in Phoenix. AZ. <br />. The proposed operations staff has considerable experience with service roll-outs; <br />however, this same group was in charge of a reroute in the SBWMA service area that <br />resulted in significant service disruptions and the imposition of liquidated damages. <br /> <br />. Primary staff managing the future contract was average compared to the other <br />proposers; specifically, the proposed General Manager currently has less than 2 years of <br />experience in the sol id waste and recycling industry . <br /> <br />. Solid reference check results, but worst overall compared to the other three proposers <br />(see Table 17 and Appendix B). <br />Transition Plans <br /> <br />. The transition and contingency plans did not provide sufficient details to demonstrate the <br />company's ability to successfully transition to the new services. In addition, Allied's <br />three-page implementation plan contained significantly fewer details than the more <br />comprehensive transition plans submitted by Norcal and BEST. <br /> <br />. The proposal states several times that there will not be any issues related to transition; <br />however, notable transition issues related to the company's new InfoPro software have <br />recently been experienced in the SBWMA service area. <br />Technical Proposal <br /> <br />. Allied will award and recognize Commercial customers who have increased their <br />recycling diversion by 10% or more with a "Seal of Sustainability." <br /> <br />. With the exception of the "Seal of Sustainability," the company is proposing a similar <br />commercial recycling program as is currently provided with no deviations in strategy, <br />sales approach, the tools used to attract and retain accounts, or reporting. <br /> <br />. Collection service routing is based on a 9.5-hour day shift thus resulting in the need for <br />fewer drivers and collection vehicles then the companies running shorter 8-hour shifts <br />(BEST and Republic) (see Table 14). <br /> <br />. The proposed On-Call (Bulky Item) Collection Service is the least conducive to ensuring <br />high diversion of the four proposers. The collection service will use two trucks: one to <br />collect garbage and the other to collect recyclable materials, bulky items, major <br />appliances, and e-scrap all on this one truck. Therefore, commingling all the materials <br />listed and organics/green waste on one truck is not conducive to keeping materials <br />segregated for high levels of diversion. In addition, Allied was the only company to <br />include in its proposal weight and size set-out limitations that were not consistent with <br />those specified in the Collection Agreement, yet the company did not take any <br />exceptions to the Collection Agreement. <br /> <br />. Integration ot the IntoPro customer service system and routing software has not been <br />operationally tested locally or at a SBWMA-wide scale and the company's proposal to <br />use this system was unresponsive to the RFP requirements that require providing <br />Member Aoencies the abiiitv to oenerate work orders remotely. <br /> <br />SBWMA Collection Services RFP <br />Selection Committee Report: <br />Evaluation and Scoring of Proposals <br /> <br />Page 150f31 <br />August 21 , 2008 <br />