My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2009-04-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
CC Min 2009-04-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2012 4:01:30 PM
Creation date
5/5/2009 12:34:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
4/13/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8. STAFF REPORTS <br /> A. Second Status Update from Pilot Community Tree Board. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Approve by motion directing the Public Works staff to: launch a tree education <br /> program; obtain delegated authority to issue citations enforcing tree preservation <br /> ordinances; consider requiring fees for issuance of pruning and removal permits <br /> and review existing fine schedule; strengthen the city's policies that protect trees <br /> during construction and development projects. (209) <br /> Mr. Frank Schwartz, member of the tree board, made a brief presentation to the City <br /> Council (presentation on file). <br /> Questions were asked about the current educational program on tree related issues. One <br /> Council Member mentioned the need to understand the current economic climate and <br /> budgetary limitations. The issue of tree inventory was discussed as well as review of <br /> trees. One Council Member would like the standards clearly communicated to the <br /> community so that there are no surprises. One Council Member would like to know the <br /> intend of the education program, its goals, audience, etc. It was also discussed that prior <br /> to considering penalization it might be more appropriate to create an incentive system and <br /> partner with the residents. Council consensus was that a less legalistic approach <br /> was preferable. It was the Council's preference to incentivize and educate instead <br /> of regulating and citing people or businesses. Council appreciated the report and <br /> thanked the Tree Board for all its work. <br /> Two additional members of the Tree Board were introduced and they were: Ms. Black and <br /> Mr. Nordensten. The new tree specialist, Ms. D'Agostino was also present. Various <br /> Council Members inquired about how members of the public could give input on this <br /> suggested process. The concept of a certification process for tree pruners was discussed. <br /> One Council Member asked if this body will be an appeals body and that currently the <br /> appeals function falls within the Parks Recreation Commission purview. <br /> Final comments from Council focused on a better understanding and alignment between <br /> the Council strategic initiatives and this proposal. Mayor Foust stated she prefers a <br /> defined focus for this body with various options for Council consideration. Similarly, she <br /> would like to see how these fit in with the Council's objectives as well the economic picture <br /> and budget situation. Council directed the Tree Board to reconsider its recommendations <br /> keeping in mind the following: alignment of resources, strategic initiatives, economic <br /> context and budgetary implications of recommendations. <br /> Council took a break from 8:45 p.m. to 8:55 p.m. Council resumed at 8:55 p.m. <br /> B. Recommendation for Shoreway Recycling and Disposal Center Facility Operator. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Alternative 1: <br /> JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING APRIL 13, 2009 <br /> MINUTES PAGE 5 <br /> MINUTE BOOK NO. 62 <br /> Page No. 342 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.