My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res21 16010 final
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
Res21 16010 final
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2021 11:44:48 AM
Creation date
12/8/2021 11:38:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/6/2021
Description
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY ADOPTING ALL OF VOLUME 1 AND THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY PORTION OF VOLUME 2 THE SAN MATEO COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
822
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Earthquake <br /> <br />San Mateo County and participating cities strictly enforce all seismic building codes and design standards to <br />prevent loss of life and property caused by earthquake. Municipal planning partners are encouraged to establish <br />general plans with policies directing land use and dealing with issues of seismic safety. These plans provide the <br />capability at the local municipal level to protect future development from the impacts of earthquakes. Public <br />education, cooperation with the development community, and individual preparedness are essential as the <br />planning area welcomes new community members and businesses. <br /> <br />10.6 SCENARIO <br />Based on history and geology, the planning area will be frequently impacted by earthquakes. The worst-case <br />scenario is a higher-magnitude event (7.5 or higher) with an epicenter within 50 miles of the county. The San <br />Andreas fault scenario modeled for this risk assessment would mimic this scenario. Earthquakes of this magnitude <br />or higher could lead to massive structural failure of property on soils prone to liquefaction. Building and road <br />foundations would lose load-bearing strength. Injuries could occur from debris, such as parapets and chimneys <br />that could topple or be shaken loose and fall on those walking or driving below. Levees and revetments built on <br />these poor soils would likely fail, representing a loss of critical facilities. An earthquake event of this magnitude <br />located off the coast could cause a significant local tsunami that would further damage structures and jeopardize <br />lives. An earthquake may also cause minor landslides along unstable slopes, which put at risk major roads and <br />highways that act as sole evacuation routes. This would be even more likely if the earthquake occurred during the <br />winter or early spring. <br /> <br />10.7 ISSUES <br />Important issues associated with an earthquake include the following: <br /> More information is needed on the exposure and performance of soft-story construction within the <br />planning area. <br /> It is estimated that over 70 percent of the planning area’s building stock was built prior to 1975, when <br />seismic provisions became uniformly applied through building code applications. Many structures may <br />need seismic retrofits in order to withstand a moderate earthquake. Residential retrofit programs, such as <br />Earthquake Brace+Bolt, may be able to assist in the costs of these efforts. <br /> Based on the modeling of critical facility performance performed for this plan, a high number of facilities <br />in the planning area are expected to suffer complete or extensive damage from scenario events. These <br />facilities are prime targets for structural retrofits. <br /> Critical facility owner should be encouraged to create or enhance Continuity of Operations Plans using <br />the information on risk and vulnerability contained in this plan. <br /> Geotechnical standards should be established that take into account the probable impacts from <br />earthquakes in the design and construction of new or enhanced facilities. <br /> There are a large number of earthen dams within the planning area. Dam failure warning and evacuation <br />plans and procedures should be reviewed and updated to reflect the dams’ risk potential associated with <br />earthquake activity in the region. The County levees should also be included in any assessments for <br />earthquake risk. <br /> Earthquakes could trigger other natural hazard events such as dam failures, flood, fire, and landslides, <br />which could severely damage the County. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />10-29
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.