Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Plan Development Methodology <br /> <br /> Figure 3-6. Survey #2 Survey Responses by Zip Code <br /> <br /> <br /> The survey asked the same question for each of the three top hazards: “To help prepare for an extreme <br />heat/earthquake/wildfire event, what would be most helpful to me is...” Over 70% of survey respondents <br />replied that the top choice for all three is: “Knowing my community can provide safe, accessible <br />emergency shelters for my family and neighbors if we need to leave our homes during such events” <br />The survey and a summary of results are included in Appendix B. <br /> <br />Final Public Comment Period <br />In total, 54 comments on the draft plan were received via the Survey Monkey platform and/or the email address <br />posted on the Hazard Mitigation Plan website. Of these, 36 were specific to individual planning partners. The <br />Core Planning Team forwarded these comments to the appropriate planning partners. Comments related to the <br />scope and scale of this hazard mitigation plan resulted in edits to the plan. The Core Planning Team maintained a <br />“comment tracker” to keep an internal record on the comments received and the formal response to them. <br /> <br />Meeting Attendance and Participation <br />Table 3-4 summarizes attendance and comments received from the public meetings. <br /> <br />3.8 PLAN DEVELOPMENT CHRONOLOGY/MILESTONES <br />Table 3-5 summarizes important milestones in the development of the plan update. <br /> <br /> <br />3-13