Reso PC20-13 PC 0118 Reso South Main Mixed-Use Project Signed

Browse Search

ATTY/RESO.0118/PC RESO SOUTH MAIN MIXED-USED PROJECT REV: 10-21-2020 PR Page 10 of 31 Impact BIO -4b: The Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Impact BIO-4c: The Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. Impact BIO-4d: The Project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Impact BIO-4e: Project development would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. Impact BIO-4f: Project development would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. 5. Cultural Resources. These findings regarding the Project’s potential impacts on cultural resources are based on the analyses on pages CUL 4.5-2 through CUL 4.5-3 of the Initial Study, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety. Impact CR-3: The Project would not disturb human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. 6. Energy. These findings regarding the Project’s potential impacts on energy resources are based on the analyses on pages EN 4.6-1 through EN 4.6-4 of the Initial Study, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety. Impact EN-6a: Implementation of the Project would not result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation. Impact EN-6b: Implementation of the Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. 7. Geology, Soils and Seismicity. These findings regarding the Project’s potential impacts relating to geology, soils and seismicity are based on the analyses on pages GEO 4.7-4 through GEO 4.7-9 of the Initial Study, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety. Impact GEO-7ai: Implementation of the Project would not exacerbate the potential for rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault. Impact GEO-7aiv: Implementation of the Project would not exacerbate the