Reso PC21-10 0073 PC Reso 239 Vera Ave

Browse Search

ATTY/RESO.0073/PC RESO 239 VERA AVE REV: 09-24-2021 VR Page 4 of 16 a. The map, design, or improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the general or specific plans, the zoning ordinance, or subdivision improvement requirements. The proposed subdivision and associated improvements are consistent with Redwood City’s General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, and all applicable subdivision improvement requirements, in that the Project meets the requirements for lot design, utilities, and improvements to the right-way. There is no specific plan that applies to the project site. b. The site is physically suited for the proposed type or density of development. The project site is flat and located in an urban environment for which all public utilities and services are already established and the density is consistent with the General Plan. c. The design or proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife, or their habitat, or cause serious public health problems. The project site is already developed and does not contain natural features or areas that would be considered habitat for fish or wildlife. The proposed development will improve the site with stormwater treatment. d. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision will not conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision, and acceptable alternate public easements will not need to be provided. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map and associated improvements does not conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the proposed project site. Additionally, the project site does not have any public utilities or associated improvements that would be in conflict with the proposed project. e. The reasons submitted for the granting of any exceptions applied for comply with requirements for findings described in Section 30.69, and the tentative map is deemed not workable without the granting of such exceptions. No exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance are requested.