Reso PC21-10 0073 PC Reso 239 Vera Ave

Browse Search

ATTY/RESO.0073/PC RESO 239 VERA AVE REV: 09-24-2021 VR Page 5 of 16 f. Such other findings of conflict with written public policy or with the public interest as the Planning Commission may determine. The Project does not conflict with any written public policy or with the public interest. g. In addition, the following finding is required by Government Code Section 66473.5: The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map and land use is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the City’s General Plan, as described in the staff report. While the state law also references specific plans, there is no specific plan that applies to the project site. Section 5. Architectural Permit AP2020-008 (Section 45.4): The Commission finds that, among other reasons: a. The existence of sufficient variety in the design of the structure and grounds to avoid monotony in the external appearance. The building is designed in a contemporary style and utilizes articulated elevations, varied roof heights, and a mix of materials to break-up the massing, height, and scale. The building base utilizes different materials, front entry frames, and landscaping, as well as a clearly defined entryways. The building contains numerous and well-proportioned windows, openings, and glazing. The massing would utilize material transitions, recesses and bump outs for architectural interest and to break up the massing. b. The size and design of the structure shall be considered for the purpose of determining that the structure is in proportion to its building site and that it has a balance and unity among its external features so as to present a harmonious appearance. The proposed design meets all applicable development standards that address massing, including setbacks, height, open space and is designed to be proportional to the site. The Project meets the maximum 35’-0” height limit, and the required setbacks. The building is well designed with a consistent architectural style throughout each elevation, including well- proportioned and consistent design that creates a balanced and harmonious appearance. c. The extent to which the structure conforms to the general character of other structures in the vicinity insofar as the character can be ascertained and is found to be architecturally desirable.