Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Statements Required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br />Redwood City Transit District DTPP Amendments 5 ESA / 202100421.00 <br />Subsequent Environmental Impact Report October 2022 <br />and economic and development patterns and trends; (iii) federal, state and local laws, <br />regulations, guidelines and publications applicable to or affecting the Project; and (iv) reports, <br />projections, documents and other materials regarding statewide, regional, and local planning <br />and development matters within and outside of the City; and <br /> All other documents and materials relating to the Project as described in Public Resources Code <br />Section 21167.6, as applicable. <br />The record of proceedings is available for review by responsible agencies and interested <br />members of the public during normal business hours at 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, <br />California. The custodian of these documents is the City of Redwood City’s Planning Division. <br />B. Findings Regarding Preparation and Consideration of the SEIR <br />The City Council finds, with respect to the City’s preparation, review and consideration of <br />the SEIR, that: <br /> The City exercised its independent judgment in accordance with Public Resources Code <br />Section 21082.1(c) in retaining the independent consulting firm Environmental Science <br />Associates (ESA) to prepare the SEIR, and ESA prepared the SEIR under the supervision and <br />at the direction of the City’s Community Development and Transportation Director and the <br />SEIR reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis. <br /> The City circulated the DSEIR for review by responsible and trustee agencies and the public <br />and submitted it to the State Clearinghouse for review and comment by state agencies, as <br />required by CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. <br /> The SEIR and the proposed Project were presented to the City’s Planning Commission, which <br />reviewed and considered, and conducted a public hearing thereon. The Planning Commission <br />determined that the SEIR was adequate and sufficient, and prepared in compliance with CEQA <br />and the CEQA Guidelines, and recommended to the City Council that the City Council certify <br />the SEIR and approve the Project. <br /> The SEIR and the proposed Project were presented to the City Council of the City, with the <br />recommendation of the City’s Planning Commission. The City Council reviewed and <br />considered, and conducted a public hearing on, the SEIR and proposed Project. <br /> The SEIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines and <br />reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis. <br />By these Findings, the City Council ratifies, adopts and incorporates the analyses, <br />explanations, findings, responses to comments, and conclusions of the SEIR, except as otherwise <br />specifically provided and described in these Findings. <br />V. Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts <br />A detailed analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Project, and proposed <br />mitigation measures to address all of the identified potentially significant impacts, is set forth in <br />Chapters 4 through 17 of the DSEIR, as incorporated into the FSEIR. The City Council concurs <br />with the conclusions in the DSEIR, as incorporated into the FSEIR, that changes or alterations have