My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC22-14 0114 PC Reso Certifying Final EIR 557 E. Bayshore Road
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
Reso PC22-14 0114 PC Reso Certifying Final EIR 557 E. Bayshore Road
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2024 11:40:13 AM
Creation date
7/31/2024 11:39:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
12/13/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTY/RESO.0114/PC RESO CERTIFYING FINAL EIR – 557 E. BAYSHORE ROAD <br />REV: 12-09-22 VR <br />Page 22 of 61 <br />alternative does not meet any of the objectives of the proposed project. <br /> <br />No Project - Existing Plans and Policies Alternative <br />The No Project-Existing Plans and Policies Alternative would assume the currently <br />proposed project is not approved, and a different project is proposed based on what the <br />General Plan currently allows. An alternative project that is consistent with the General <br />Plan would allow for commercial development on the southern portion of the property and <br />for mixed-use development on the northern portion of the property. The alternative project <br />could potentially be similar in scale to or larger than the proposed development, as allowed <br />under the General Plan. Based on allowed development capacities on the site, an alternative <br />project could construct up to 507 residential units (422 base units plus 85 bonus) and up to <br />111,064 square feet of commercial uses, which would result in a greater level of <br />development than the proposed project. The alternative may or may not provide affordable <br />housing to the City in the same amount proposed by the project. <br /> <br />The environmental effects of redevelopment the site with a different development project <br />consistent with the General Plan would likely result in similar construction and operational <br />effects as the proposed project. To the extent more intense development were to be <br />proposed beyond what is currently pending with the subject project application, <br />construction and operational effects could be increased. <br /> <br />No Project - Refurbishing Existing Development Alternative <br />The No Project- Refurbishing Existing Development Alternative would assume the <br />currently vacant movie theatre and parking lot are refurbished and reopened for use. Under <br />this alternative, the existing vacant movie theater building could be re-occupied with a <br />theater use or with another commercial use allowed by the current CG – General <br />Commercial zoning. The existing development, based on its location on the site, does not <br />comply with the underlying Mixed-Use Waterfront General Plan designation. Options to <br />reuse or expand the existing development for commercial uses could be limited or <br />restricted. Implementation of the No Project-Existing Development Refurbishing <br />Alternative would avoid the less than significant impacts with mitigation identified in this <br />EIR. The No Project-Existing Development Refurbishing Alternative would not, however, <br />allow for new waterfront, high density, mixed-use development to be constructed on the <br />project site consistent with the General Plan. This alternative does not meet any of the <br />objectives of the proposed project. <br /> <br />Design Alternative-Reduced Building Height of Residential Buildings <br />According to the Biological Resource Report, the greatest risk of bird collisions with <br />buildings occurs in the area within 40-60 feet off the ground because this is the area in <br />which most bird activity occurs. The project has a maximum proposed height of <br />approximately 55 feet. The reduced building height alternative would reduce the number <br />of floors within the residential buildings to four, reducing the building height to a maximum <br />of 45 feet. Based on the currently proposed floor plans, removing the fifth floor from each <br />residential building would result in a reduction of 102 residential units, leaving the project <br />with a total of 378 units. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.