Laserfiche WebLink
ATTY/RESO.0114/PC RESO CERTIFYING FINAL EIR – 557 E. BAYSHORE ROAD <br />REV: 12-09-22 VR <br />Page 23 of 61 <br />While this alternative would reduce the potential for bird strikes, it would result in similar <br />impacts to other sensitive biological resources (Congdon’s tarplant, nesting birds, the <br />spread invasive weeds, reduction in proposed landscaping, nighttime lighting disturbance, <br />and impacts to the salt marsh harvest mouse and salt marsh harvest shrew. This alternative <br />may reduce construction NOx emissions slightly, but not to the point where the identified <br />mitigation would no longer be required. Additionally, the significant VMT impact <br />associated with the proposed fitness center would still <br />occur. <br /> <br />Design Alternative-Residential Building Connection <br />This design alternative would remove the walkway between Building A and Building B <br />and connect the two residential buildings. The alternative would prevent birds from <br />colliding into the facades between the two residential buildings, as it would close off the <br />flight path between the two buildings. <br /> <br />While this design alternative would reduce the potential for bird strikes, it would result in <br />similar impacts to other sensitive biological resources (Congdon’s tarplant, nesting birds, <br />the spread invasive weeds, nighttime lighting disturbance, and impacts to the salt marsh <br />harvest mouse and salt marsh harvest shrew. Also, depending on the final design, this <br />alternative may conflict with BCDC view corridor requirements. Additionally, the <br />significant VMT impact associated with the proposed fitness center would still occur. <br /> <br />The CEQA Guidelines require that an EIR describe a reasonable range of alternatives that <br />would feasibly attain most of the basic project objectives but would avoid or substantially <br />lessen any of the significant environmental effects of the project, and then evaluate the <br />comparative merits of such alternatives. (Guidelines §15126(a)). Based on the analyses in <br />Section of the DEIR, the City has determined that all of the proposed Project’s potentially <br />significant environmental effects would be avoided or reduced to less-than-significant <br />levels through implementation of the mitigation measures described in the DEIR and <br />MMRP: Air Quality Impact AIR-2: The project could result in a cumulatively <br />considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- <br />attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. <br />Air Quality Impact AIR-3: The Project could expose sensitive receptors to substantial <br />pollutant concentrations. <br />Biological Resources Impact BIO-1: The project could have a substantial adverse effect, <br />either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, <br />sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by <br />the CDFW or USFWS. <br />Biological Resources Impact BIO-2: The Project could have a substantial adverse effect <br />on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional <br />plans, policies, regulations or by the CDFW or USFWS. <br />Biological Resources Impact BIO-C: The Project could result in a cumulatively <br />considerable contribution to a significant biological resources impact.