Laserfiche WebLink
FY 2025-2026 HSFA Scoring Sheet <br />0. – No evidence or does not meet basic requirements <br />1. – May somewhat meet the requirements or provide minimal evidence, but lacking lots of vital information <br />2. – Meets some basic requirements, but lacking some vital information <br />3. – Meets most requirements <br />4. – Meets all requirements <br />5. – Exceeds requirements <br /> <br />Question Criteria Score Weight Total <br />1&2 Project is vital for survival for priority populations, serving large numbers and/or serving smaller numbers in an intensive way 5 4 3 2 1 0 x5 <br />3 Timeline to complete project and achieve performance benchmarks is appropriate (not scored) <br />4a/b/c Goals are meaningful and measurable; program is achieving ambitious goals from prior years that are critical services for the priority population(s) 5 4 3 2 1 0 x4 <br />5 Collaboration is thoughtful, directed, and central to achieving program goals 5 4 3 2 1 0 x2 <br />6 Serves significant number of Redwood City residents given the type of service offered 5 3 1 0 x2 <br />7a Program demographics reflect the demographics of Redwood City’s priority populations 5 3 1 0 x2 <br />7b Outreach to underserved portions of priority population(s) is intentional, well-planned, and effective 5 4 3 2 1 0 x1 <br />8 Other sources of revenue are diverse and leverage HSFA to achieve program goals 5 4 3 2 1 0 x2 <br />9 Staffing is appropriate (not scored) <br />10 Program is a reasonable cost for the services provided 5 3 1 0 x1 <br />11 Marketing appears to be appropriate, accessible, and effective across multiple segments of the priority population(s) 5 4 3 2 1 0 x1 <br />Total Points 100 <br /> * “priority population” refers to populations prioritized in RWC Consolidated Plan <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />9.C. - Page 13 of 27 <br />466