Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7B <br />Page 25 <br /> <br /> <br />of Directors. The decision-making process for determining <br />what is a fundable priority would be based on the recom- <br />mended checklist for determining Alliance priorities in <br />Section 4 of the Strategic Plan. <br /> <br />There are three categories of existing and new initiatives in <br />Program Area 3: <br /> <br />I. Funding and Resource Development <br />a. Nurturing existing (under relationships <br />b. Seeking opportunities (or new funding partnershiPs <br /> <br />2. Development of Community-Based Mobility Services <br />a. Community Shuttles <br />b. City Ischool transportation alternatives <br />c. Collaboration with Sam Trans on Senior Mobility <br /> <br />3. Community Facilitation of Transportation Alternatives <br /> <br />c. Transportation management associations <br /> <br />d. Community fair promoting transportation alterna- <br />tives <br /> <br />e. Mobility Enhancing Land Development <br /> <br />Funding was the first thing that almost all interviewees <br />mentioned. This is clearly an issue on the top of most <br />people's minds. As discussed earlier, funding levels are suf- <br />ficient to have a robust employer-based commute alterna- <br />tives program. However, current funding levels and fund- <br />ing agreements have limited the ability to respond to some <br />Alliance Board member desires for increasing community- <br />based mobility services. <br /> <br />In responding to the question, "What opportunities are <br />open to the Alliance?" the most frequent answer to this <br />question came in the form of some sort of new program, <br />ranging from senior shuttles, working with schools and <br />colleges, to various ideas for getting involved at the early <br />stages of new developments in the County. New fund- <br />ing sources were seen as an opportunity and people also <br />pointed out that working with others to streamline opera- <br />tions and to deal with new developments could both be <br />opportunities in the future. <br /> <br />Collaboration with key partners such as SMCTD and CI <br />CAG was extremely important to stakeholders. Efforts to <br />avoid duplication of work with other agencies (mainly SM- <br />CTO) was mentioned a lot as well as lack of focus and the <br />need for a clearer definition of the Alliance's role, focus <br />and priorities in relationship to these partners. <br /> <br />The Alliance, SMCTO, and C/CAG have scheduled high <br />level meetings in the near future to achieve better coordI- <br />nation. The outcomes of this collaboration will need to be <br />ongoing, and incorporated into the Strategic Plan. <br /> <br />Program Area 3 is meant to be the collaborative forum <br />for advocating and evaluating the ongoing needs and Ideas <br />for new programs identified by Alliance Board members. <br />Throughout the Alliance's history, members have advo- <br />cated for specific projects that particularly benefit their <br />jurisdiction or multiple adjoining jurisdictions. Program <br />Area 3 provides the process for developing new resources <br />and tools to expand transportation alternatives. <br /> <br />23 <br />