Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7B <br />Page 28 <br /> <br /> <br />Goal: <br /> <br />· Implementation of future community-based shuttle <br />should be based on direct collaboration with SM- <br /> <br />CTO and based on a prioritized needs assessment. <br /> <br />Obiectives: <br /> <br />· As discussed earlier, the SMCTO Comprehensive <br />Operations Analysis should provide guidance to <br />the cities and the Alliance on planning for future <br />community-based shuttles that do not duplicate <br />Sam Trans local routes. These will be defined <br />through direct collaboration with sMCTO and <br />other agencies. Specific objectives should be devel- <br /> <br />oped at conclusion of this collaborative effort. <br /> <br />Alliance Role: <br /> <br />· In the past, the Alliance role has been to be respon- <br />sive to the City's request for operating and managing <br />local community shuttle services. SamTrans has been <br />represented in these discussions, but there has not <br />been a cohesive plan to date on community-based <br />shuttles. Planning for these shuttles should achieve <br />the strategic objectives of SMCTO and the Alliance. <br /> <br />Strategies: <br /> <br />. The SamTrans Comprehensive Operations Analysis <br />will be evaluating all SamTrans routes, including lo- <br />cal routes, The role of community-based shuttles <br />operated of the Alliance should be included in this <br /> <br />analysis. New roles, responsibilities and coordi- <br />nation efforts for filling community mobility gaps <br />should be done in a collaborative manner with <br />sMCTO as part of this process. <br /> <br />· Community-based shuttles require significantly <br />more staff resources for customer service and ser- <br />vice monitoring than the employer-based shuttles. <br />At present, all shuttles are combined with shuttle <br />management and there is not a separate cost ac- <br />counting for the community shuttle program. The <br />Alliance should establish separate cost accounting <br />for the employer based and community-based shut- <br />tles. A policy should be established to adequately <br />cover the administrative cost of community-based <br />shuttles. <br /> <br />· In the new Measure A, community-based shuttles <br />are consistent with the Goal 4B of the Expenditure <br />Plan: "Improve local shuttle services to provide a <br />viable option to the private automobile for local <br />trips, and to meet the needs of transit depen- <br />dents." The Alliance should collaborate with SM- <br />CTO to determine the prioritized needs for future <br />community shuttles. This should be part of the <br />2009 discussions with SMCTO and C/ CAG. <br /> <br />Measures of Effectiveness: <br /> <br />C/CAG has established the following efficiency standards <br />for C/CAG funded services: <br /> <br />The benchmark goals for the fixed route services are: <br />)) Cost per passenger: < $6 <br />)) Operating cost: < $50 per hour <br />)) Riders per Service Hour: > 10 <br /> <br />26 <br />