Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7B <br />Page 44 <br /> <br /> <br />verely cut. Others pointed out that if funding were cut, <br />the cuts would probably be made to the shuttle service <br />and if that were the case the Alliance would have to find <br />alternative funding sources or other agencies to take on <br />the work of the shuttles, either directly or by partnering <br />with the Alliance. Many people were clear that it was <br />important to keep the shuttles going. come what may. <br />Other suggestions included cutting staff, cutting inven- <br />tive programs and cutting outreach or figuring out how <br />to outsource or automate some services. <br /> <br />few comments about working more with partners on <br />specific things like promoting CCAG's bike map and <br />a suggestion about the order of the agenda at Board <br />meetings were new. <br /> <br />17. If the Alliance's budget were halved, what <br />would you recommend dolngl <br />People responded to this theoretical question with <br />gusto! Many would increase shuttles throughout the <br />community - with senior shuttles, schoolchildren and <br />general non-commuter shuttles being mentioned. Oth- <br />ers would spend increased funds on more outreach to <br />existing and new audiences. Many interviewees simply <br />wanted to spend increased funding on improving current <br />services both by hiring more staff and investigating ways <br />of expanding and streamlining programs such as reward- <br />ing long-time car and van-poolers as well as new ideas <br />such as a "shared car" program. <br /> <br />18. What Is the Alliance not doing now that <br />you'd like to be dolngl <br />This final question was aimed at eliciting any last <br />responses that people might have omitted saying in <br />answer to previous questions. Most people said that <br />they were happy with their previous answers and gave <br />no response. If people did comment. their answers <br />were mainly a repeat of their previous answers with a <br /> <br />42 <br />