AgdaPkt 2010-06-07 clds, jnt - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7A Page 85 The Purpose Table below captures to qualities of each district as described by the associated purpose statement. PURPOSE TABLE Rl R2 R3 R4 RS Family living X X Individual Privacy X X Individual Open Space X X Individual Facilities X X Apartment LivIng X X X Co.operatively Used Open Space X )( X Cooperatively Used Facilities X X X Based on the purpose statement of each Residential District, one can conclude that that Rl and R2 share similar purpose' that is not similar to the apartment zoned districts, R3, R4, and RS. The impJied relationship between residential districts is also manifested in the designation of each district. The designation of each district is included below. Article 5 - R-l (RESIDENTlAl- SINGLE-FAMILY) DISTRICT Article 6 - R-2 (RESIDENTIAl- DUPLEX) DISTRICT Article 7 - R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY - LOW DENSITY) DISTRICT Article 8 - R-4 (MULTI-FAMILY - MEDIUM DENSITY) DISTRICf Artide 9 - R-S (MULTI-FAMILY - HIGH DENSI'N) DISTRICT Again, it is implied that Rl and R2 are similar. Both Rl and R2 are designated "RESIDENTIAL". R3, R4, and R5 are designated "MULTI-FAMilY". Both the. designation and purpose statement for each the residential district have not been modified since ZonIng Ordinance was created iI11964. It is Incorrect to state there is an implied apartment related density In the Zoning Ordinance for the H2 District. What Is strongly. Implied In the Zoning Ordinance Is that the R2 District Is not an apartment district. DENSITY ANALYSIS NOT ADEQUATE There is insufficient information hi the Initial Study to determine how the current R2 density of 8~30 family units per acre was calculated and therefore its accLiracy. There is insufficient information in the Initial Study to determine how the expected R2 density of 8.73 family units per acre was calculated and therefore it accuracy. In addition, there Js no reference to an analysis documents. Only the results of 11