My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agdapkt 2010-07-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Agdapkt 2010-07-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2010 12:05:24 PM
Creation date
7/22/2010 1:17:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
7/26/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />) <br /> <br />Council discussed the benefit of combining the newsletter with the Parks and Recs <br />catalogue. There was a suggestion to have a letter from the City Manager and the <br />Mayor, on the first issue, to introduce this change. It was also noted that Economic <br />Development is something that should be under the City Manager and the Strategic <br />Initiatives. This was a concern for one Council Member as this should be a constant <br />priority, and that it needs to have breadth and depth. Mayor Ira wanted the merging of <br />the newsletter to be advertised well so that the full community is aware. It was <br />suggested that the water bill be used to inform the community. <br /> <br />Mayor Ira mentioned the need for interconnectedness and he believes it is important <br />that budgets be reviewed in a larger scale. There was consensus on the elimination of <br />the newsletter. One Council Member thanked the City Clerk for the proposed reductions <br />and she found these a good approach. Mayor Ira stated that we need to match the jobs <br />responsibility with the tasks employees perform and stretch their potential to the <br />maximum. Mayor Ira explained that he and the City Manger have been talking about <br />the Economic Development Coordinator and he hopes this will be before Council <br />sometime in August. Council was vehemently interested in pursuing this initiative. <br /> <br />One Council Member noted that BIT and HR were two examples of cutting deeper than <br />the 80/0, more specifically 10.5% and 130/0 respectively. One Council Member wanted <br />more in the way of updates when items get delayed. Another Council Member <br />mentioned that turning items around quickly in this department, Building, Infrastructure <br />and Transportation, will have an impact and the community will feel it. Regarding <br />Public Works Council commented that the reductions are in areas where the public is <br />impacted. There was also a comment to communicate with the impacted residents <br />maybe even through robocalls. <br /> <br />At 8:45 p.m. Council took a 10-minute break resuming at 8:55 p.m. <br /> <br />City Manager Ingram asked if the Council was going to have another public comment <br />section. Mayor Ira said there were no more speaker cards. The City Manager was <br />asked to explain the alternatives and different reductions. Mr. Ingram covered the <br />revenue and expenditure alternatives. City Manager then asked Mr. Chang to provide a <br />brief overview of the Parking Meter Rates. Mr. Chang explained how the parking meter <br />rates would impact the vehicular customers. Some Council Members were in support <br />of increasing the parking fees due to the gloomy economic picture. There was a <br />request to add the information about the parking meters and how these work. The <br />creation of a self-explanatory video was suggested. It was mentioned that one <br />restaurant is having trouble getting valet parking and it would be good for staff to work <br />with neighboring restaurants to provide these opportunities. <br /> <br />Mr. Chang was asked to explain Gas Tax Shift. Mr. Ponty explained that these monies <br />derive from Prop 42 and he provided details on how this would work. This would be like <br />a shock absorber approach for now. There was Council consensus that this shift is a <br />one-time strategy and not ongoing. Council was interested but it wants to be extremely <br />cautious with these types of shifts not making them the norm. One Council Member <br />also talked about pension contribution and employee contributions to medical <br /> <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD <br />MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br />June 28, 2010 <br />PAGE 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.