Laserfiche WebLink
q.A-Z <br />CALIFORNIA CITIES TO RECEIVE FEDERAL <br />HOMELAND SECURITY SUBSIDIES <br />The Department of Homeland Security announced <br />Tuesday that approximately $100 million dollars of its <br />FY 2003 Budget would be dedicated to preparing large <br />U.S. cities for potential terrorist threats. Of the seven <br />cities named, Los Angeles and San Francisco will <br />receive nearly a quarter of the allocated funds. The <br />decision tomes as the House and Senate weigh the <br />possibilities of the $2.2 billion set aside for Homeland <br />Security as part of President Bush's $74.7 billion <br />wartime budget. <br />The State of California has already received $45 <br />million as part of a $566 million grant by the Office of <br />Domestic Preparedness last month. <br />STATE COMMISSION TO EXAMINE <br />REMOTE SALES TAX ISSUES <br />Alex Padilla, President of the Los Angeles City Council <br />and a member of the League Board of Directors, and League <br />Legislative Representative Dan Carrigg, are among those <br />scheduled to testify April 14 at a public outreach meeting to <br />be conducted by the California Commission on Tax Policy in <br />the New Economy in Los Angeles. <br />The commission was established by legislation enacted <br />in 2000, and charged with examining the impact of the new <br />economy on various types of taxes and tax policy. It aims to <br />provide "an open, public, fair, and balanced participatory <br />forum" for the development of a long -tern strategy for <br />revising state and local tax structure for California. One <br />topic to be covered at this meeting is regional economies <br />and concerns about the "fiscalization" of land use. <br />The cities of Los Angeles and San Francisco, which <br />will receive $12.42 and $10.74 million respectively, were <br />identified by the Office of Domestic Preparedness as <br />possessing infrastructure of national importance in <br />addition to high population and vulnerability. <br />The San Francisco Chronicle reported in an article <br />dated March 29 that a survey by the U.S. Conference of <br />Mayors found that San Francisco and Los Angeles have <br />spent more per week on homeland security than any <br />other U.S. city apart from New York. San Francisco <br />has reported $2.5 million Collars in weekly expenditures. <br />This figure includes the added costs of controlling <br />vehement anti -war demonstrations, which Mayor Willie <br />Brown said cost the city $900,000 a day at the onset of <br />the war in Iraq. <br />It is hoped that the federal appropriations currently <br />under discussion in Congress will also provide relief for <br />other overburdened California cities, who have thus far <br />bome the added costs of Homeland Security without <br />federal assistance. The separate plans by the House <br />and Senate call for between $600 and $700 million to be <br />distributed by the State, with no less than 80 % of these <br />funds allocated directly to local government. <br />Our Mission <br />Restore and protect local control for cities through <br />education and advocacy to enhance the quality of life for all <br />Californians. <br />A number of other individuals knowledgeable about <br />state and local government finance are slated to testify, <br />including Sunne Wright McPeak, an ex- officio member of the <br />California Economic Strategy Panel; economist Arthur Laffer; <br />former Assembly Speakers Antonio Villaraigosa and Bob <br />Hertzberg; and Los Angeles Supervisor Zev Yaroslovsky. <br />The commission is required to submit a report to the <br />Governor and the Legislature on its findings. <br />a a a a a a s a s a a a. a a a a a <br />DISAPPOINTING NEWS FROM SUPREME <br />COURT ON PUBLIC AGENCY <br />LIABILITY ISSUES <br />Despite public agencies' arguments to the contrary, <br />the California Supreme court ruled that public agency's <br />liability for personal injuries caused by a third party on <br />Property adjacent to public property. A motorist struck a <br />pedestrian in a crosswalk as she was heading to a bus <br />stop across the street. Although the transit authority <br />did not have any ownership or control over the street, <br />the pedestrian sued the transit authority in her lawsuit <br />because of its relationship to the bus stop. The pedes- <br />trian argued the bus stop was a dangerous condition of <br />public property. See Cal. Gov't Code § 830. The court <br />of appeal upheld a $1 million verdict against the transit <br />authority and the supreme court affirmed. <br />The League thanks David Baer and Kurt Franklin of <br />the San Francisco firm of Hanson Bridgett Marcus <br />Vlahos Rudy for writing the friend -of- the -court brief on <br />behalf of some 200 public agencies. The case name is <br />Bonanno v. Central Contra Costa Transit Authority, _ <br />Cal. 0 _ (April 7, 2003). <br />rAbt Z /PKIUKITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site-- www.cacities.org <br />