My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2010-11-22 clsd and regular
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
AgdaPkt 2010-11-22 clsd and regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2012 11:22:57 AM
Creation date
11/18/2010 5:05:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
11/22/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A <br /> Page 5 <br /> Basis for Appeal <br /> The appellants' basis for appeal alleged in their Supplemental Submission: Statement of <br /> Reasons or Grounds for the Appeal (Attachment 6) can be summarized into the <br /> following categories: <br /> 1. Removal of the Italian Stone Pine <br /> 2. Roof Form and Material <br /> 3. Rear Deck Size and Orientation <br /> The specific grounds for each category of appeal are set forth and responded to below. <br /> In addition to the three substantive items referenced above, the appellants also call into <br /> question multiple City policies and practices related to the issuance of Architectural <br /> Permits, as well as the method for establishing a public hearing date (Attachment 6). <br /> City staff's responses to these additional assertions have been provided in Attachment <br /> 7 because they do not relate to the substantive analysis mandated by the Redwood City <br /> Zoning �rdinance for the issuance of the Architectural Permit. <br /> AppealResponses '� <br /> 1. Removal of the Italian Stone Pine. The appellants contest removal of the <br /> Italian Stone Pine on two grounds. <br /> Appeal Ground 1(a): Permission granted to destroy the Italian Stone Pine located at the <br /> northeast front comer of the Applicants' property, proximate to fhe common properfy <br /> ' line between Applicants and Appellants (the "Pine') — when reasonable means are <br /> readily and practically availab/e to preserve the Pine. <br /> As a preliminary matter, the Zoning Administrator did not grant permission to destroy <br /> the Italian Stone Pine. Mere approval of an Architectural Permit does not afford the <br /> applicant the right to remove the Italian Stone Pine. In fact, Condition of Approval No. 7 <br /> to AP2010-09 makes it clear that the applicant must obtain a tree removal permit in <br /> order to remove the Italian Stone Pine. Rather, issuance of an Architectural Permit is <br /> an approval of the proposed project, which design includes removal of the Italian Stone <br /> Pine. In accordance with Architectural Standard E of Section 45.8, the Zoning <br /> Administrator, in determining whether to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an <br /> application, must consider the extent to which natural features, including trees, are to be <br /> retained. In approving the project that included removal of the Italian Stone Pine, the <br /> Zoning Administrator did consider whether and to what extent the Italian Stone Pine <br /> should be retained. The Zoning Administrator was informed by a Certified Arborist and <br /> the City's Urban Forestry Specialist that the Italian Stone Pine was structurally instable <br /> and in poor health. Upon the professional recommendations of the Certified Arborist <br /> and the City's Urban Forestry Specialist, the Zoning Administrator determined that <br /> retention of the Italian Stone Pine was not required. Because of the poor health rating <br /> and the tree's instability, the Zoning Administrator determined that replacement of the <br /> tree would sufficiently meet the City's goal of protecting and enhancing the natural <br /> beauty of the environment. Please refer to the Notice of Official Action (Attachment 3) <br /> or the Arborist Report (Attachment 13) for further detail and analysis. Further discussion <br /> on this issue can also be referenced in the Staff Responses to the Offer of Proof <br /> (Attachment 11). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.