Laserfiche WebLink
6.1 C <br /> Page 15 <br /> OPTION 1; Under this option the ertire Finger Park Tract would be subject ta intensive level <br /> inventory and evaluation. The anticipated Option 1 Study Area for historic architectural resources is <br /> assumed to include up to 30 historic resources located within the Finger Park Tract, as shown in San <br /> Mateo County Map Book 4, pa�e 55 (1906). The resources that are 50 years old or older would be <br /> inventoried and evaluated on DPR523 forms. I <br /> OPTI4N 2: The anticipated Option 2 Study Area for historic architectural resources would include <br /> tlie proposed project area, plus ail adjoining legal parcels, and seven legal pazcels located across I <br /> Finger Avenue in Wellesley Park. The resources in this study area that are 50 years old or older — �� <br /> and that have not been previously evaluated — would be subject to intcnsive level survey and would <br /> be inventoried and evaluated on DPR523 forms. Approximately 5 resources would require DPR523 <br /> forms. The remainder of the Fin�er Park Tract, and parcels across the street in the Wellesley Park <br /> subdivision, would be subject to reconnaissance level survey and general characterization, but no <br /> DPR523 forms would be prepared. This option would include identificatian oF a poteniial district, but <br /> may recommend the need for intensive level survey of the remainder of the Finger Park Tract. <br /> The level of et�Fori necessary to complete this evaluation will depend upon the City's input, and is <br /> preliminarily estimated for less-intensive Option 2 to be $33,000, subject to City direction. We <br /> propose to work with City staff and the historic subconsultant to determine the appropriate scope of <br /> historic work necessary, and finalize the historic work scope, once the level of effort is confirmed <br /> acceptable to the City. <br /> lf die Finger Ave Tract is determined to be eligible as a historic district, under either the Cal Register <br /> and/or City criteria, an assessment would be needed to determine; <br /> i} Whether the site's existing buildings aze contributin� structures and w�uld their <br /> demolition substantially affect the integrity/eligibility of the potential historic distriet; <br /> ii) Whether the intraduction of the new subdivision homes in the Finger Ave Tract context <br /> would compromise the potential historic district's integrity.� <br /> Mitigation measures wiil be identified for si�nificant cultural resource impacts, as appropriate. <br /> Cordilleras Creck impacts <br /> The EIR will evaluate the potential for the project to result in impacts to Cordilleras Creek in the <br /> followin� areas: <br /> Bivlogicu! Reso�nres <br /> The 2006/2007 biology studies will be peer reviewed by WRA Em�irorr�nenta! Constrltants. As parl of <br /> this peer review, a WRA biologist will conduct an updated literature review including a CDFG <br /> California Natural Diversity Database record search. A brief site visit will also be made to view <br /> current site conditions. A letter report will be prepared outlining any recommended revisions or <br /> shortcomings in the 2006 report. The estimated cost for the preparation of a Peer Review letter report <br /> is S3,2�35. In the event that WRA, DJP&A, and the City agree that a completaly new Biological <br /> Resources Assessment is warcanted, the estimated cost is $6,000. <br /> Based upon this existing information and any additional input from I�VRA Em�ironmemtu! <br /> Cunsultunts , the EIR will: <br /> � This asse�.�ment would be campleted as an additional task and is not part af the proposed EIR scope. <br /> 3 <br />