Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br /> IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> PerFot'mance Criteria Enti Verification Entit Re uirements <br /> would continue to operate at an intersection to one left lane and one at this intersection <br /> unacceptable LOS (E or F). The shared through-right lane. This would and implement <br /> additional project traffic would rause the allow the signai operation to change improvements and <br /> critical delay to increase by more than from a current split-phase (north- fair-share <br /> five (5) seconds. This change would south) to a protected left turn phasing. requirement when <br /> represent a significanf cumulative The restriping of the south leg would level of service <br /> impact. create an undesirable offset to the reaches LOS E <br /> northbound through vehicles and their (average delay of <br /> receiving lane. It is recommended greater than 55 <br /> that the segment of Middlefield Road seconds). <br /> between Main Street and Maple Street Individual projects <br /> be re-configured to a ihree lane may require <br /> roadway and provide a gradual Transportation <br /> realignment to minimize the offset Demand <br /> distance for the north-south through Management <br /> vehicles. With these improvements, (TDM) pians per <br /> this intersection would operate at LOS City Generai Plan <br /> E during the AM and PM peak hour policies and <br /> (the same as Cumulative Without C/CAG adopted <br /> Project Conditions). These measures guidelines. <br /> would reduce the project contribution <br /> to ihis cumulative impaci to a/ess- <br /> than-significant level. This <br /> mitigation would need to be added to <br /> the Redwood City Traffic Impact <br /> Mitigation Fee (TIF) projects list. <br /> In addition, this intersection is located <br /> within the DPP area. The City's New <br /> General Plan contains certain policies <br /> and programs intended to promote <br /> aliernative modes of transportation in <br /> the DPP area, emphasizing <br /> pedestrian and bicycle travel and <br /> reduction in the number of vehicle <br /> miles traveled within and by residents <br /> of the City. These policies and <br /> programs, including Policies 29.5 and � <br /> 29.6, anci Programs BE-49, BE-50, � <br /> BE-51, 8E-52 and BE-53, are known <br /> as "Pedestrian Enhanced Design" W <br /> (PED) policies and programs and are � <br /> intended to promote aiternative <br /> modes of transportation by, among <br /> other ihin s, ensurin that ihe Cit 's <br /> .. <br /> Page 22 C:1Documents and SetlingsltpassanisrlLocal SedingslTemporary fntemet FilesI0LK49lmmcht (f 0671).doc <br />