AgdaPkt 2011-01-24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED 1MPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Irr�piementation Mo�itoring and Timing Signature Date Performance Criteria Entit Verification Entit Re uirements and convenient pedestrian and bicycle travel by slowing traffic and enhancing pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. It is anticipated that, with implementation of these PED policies and programs, motor vehicle traffic flow wili be slowed and motor vehicle traffic congestion may increase in the DPP area. It is also recognized that physical improvements to the City's DPP circulation network which would normally be implemented to mitigate traffic impacts by increasing the capacity of streets, improving traffic flow, and reducing traffic congestion, would conflict wiih ihese PED policies. Implementation of this Mitigation Measure 9-16 could conflict with the PED policies and could be considered infeasible as a result of this policy conflict. In that event, this would be another basis by which this impact would be deemed to be significant and unavoidable. Impact 9-17: Cumulative Impact on Mitigation 9-17. Mitigation of the Ciiy; fair-share City If and when Broadway/Chestnut Street project contribution to the cumulative reimbursement improvements Intersection. Under Cumulative With impact would require the southbound from future adopted, City shall Project Conditions during the PM peak approach to Chestnut Street to have individual project conduct annual hour, this intersection would continue to one left turn lane, one through lane, applicants. traffic monitoring operate at unacceptable LOS F. The and one right turn lane. While this at this intersection additional project traffic would cause the could be accomplished by eliminating and implement critical delay to increase by more ihan one of the three easlbound receiving improvements and five (5) seconds. This change would lanes, the railroad track would then be fair-share represent a significant cumulative in the westbound through lane instead requirement when impact. of the left turn lane, and the through level of service lanes would not have access when a reaches LOS E train is [ravelling through. Also, (average delay of delays could be lengthy for vehicles greater than 55 � accessing Chestnut Street during off- seconds). peak hours. Therefore, this mitigation Individual projects may be infeasible, in which case this may require impact would be considered Transportation significant and unavoidable. Demand .. Page 25 C:IDocuments and SeMrngsltpassanisrlLocal SettingslTemporarylntemef Files10LK491mmchi (10671).doc