Laserfiche WebLink
8.0 <br /> Exhi�� 74 <br /> from the Project relating to asbestos and/or PCB exposures are expected to be <br /> less than significant. ��, <br /> I <br /> Impact 14f. Potential Lead-Based Paint Exposure. If lead-based paint is <br /> present and has delaminated (split into thin layers) or chipped from surfaces, <br /> airborne lead particles could be released during construction and demolition <br /> activities to implement development contemplated by the DPP. The DPP <br /> Developers of specific projects would be required to comply with Ca]OSHA, <br /> U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and City standards and <br /> regulations regarding lead-based paint exposure. However, until future <br /> development projects are proposed, assessment of potential lead-based paint <br /> exposure and required mitigation would be speculative. In addition, the DPP <br /> does not in and of itself approve any such alternative, renovation or <br /> demolition. This impact is therefore less than significant. <br /> Impact 14g. Consistency With San Mateo County Comprehensive <br /> Airport Land Use Plan. Based on the analysis in the EIR, the City has <br /> concluded that the proposed increases in building height limits in the DPP <br /> would not result in any buildings exceeding the height restrictions established <br /> for San Carlos Airport compatibility by the San Mateo County Airport Land <br /> Use Commission, and that the DPP is in all other respects consistent and <br /> compatible with the Commission's Airport Land Use Plan for the San Carlos <br /> Airport. These findings have been referred by the City to the Commission for <br /> a formal determination of ALUP consistency. As a result, the City has <br /> determined that the Project will not result in any significant impacts relating to <br /> consistency with the ALUP. <br /> 16 Geology and Soits <br /> Impact 16a. Seismic Hazards Impacts. Future development in accordance <br /> with the DPP would eapose new development and its occupants to seismic <br /> hazards, including risk of loss, injury or death. Potential risks to life and <br /> property from these seism'rc hazards would be adequately rnitigated by <br /> existing laws, regulations and policies, including the California Building <br /> Codes and the City's development review procedures. However, until future <br /> development projects are proposed, assessment of potential seismic hazards <br /> and required mitigation would be speculative. In addition, the DPP does not <br /> in and of itself approve new construction. This potential impact is therefore <br /> considered less than significant. <br /> 17 Cumulative Impacts <br /> Impact 17a. Cumulative Land Use and Planning Impacts. New <br /> development under the DPP, together with the other reasonably foreseeable <br /> development in Redwood City included in the cumulative development <br /> assumptions, would result in an estimated total of approximately 20,?27 new <br /> S 1RESOLUTIONS\Reso. 2092 CEQA Findings for DPP Eahibit B.doc ]4 <br /> 012011 <br />