AgdaPkt 2011-01-24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8.0 Exh�3� 8� Mitigation Measure 7-2 (pages 7-37-7-39 of the DEIR) because the measure requires that for any discretionary project that may have a potentially significant adverse effect on a historic resource with the DPP area the project applicant shall, to the extent feasible: (i) assure that the project adheres to either or both of the standards promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior for (a) the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings or (b) Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (1995), Weeks and Grimmer; (ii) if adherence to those standards is not feasible, the historic resource shaIl be relocated; (iii) if relocation is not feasible, the applicant shall first, document the historic resource; second, retain and reuse the historic resource; third, salvage character-defining � features for reuse on-site; or fourth, interpret the historical significance of the resource through a permanent ekhibit in a publicly accessible location onsite or elsewhere in the DPP area. However, given the uncertainty with respect to the condition of and circumstances surrounding the historic resources at the time future development projects are proposed, and without knowing the specific design characteristics of such future development proposal, the City cannot determine with certainty that Mitigation Measure 7-2 would reduce the DPP's potential impacts on historic resources to a less than significant level. Therefore, this impact remains significant and unavoidable. (ii) Remaining Impacts. Because there are no feasible mitigation , measures available to mitigate the significant impact identified above, this impact is considered significant and unavoidable. (iii) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, social, ecanomic and other benefits of the DPP override the significant adverse impacts of the DPP relating to historic resources described above, as set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations below. Impact 7-3: Impacts on Historic Districts. Future development in the DPP area on properties within or adjacent to a designated or potential historic district may materially alter the physical characteristics that convey its significance and that justify its inclusion in the California Register or its local designation. Such an adverse change to a CEQA-defined historic resource would constitute a significant impact. a) Potential Impact. The impact identified above is described and discussed on pages 7-39 to 7-40 of the DEIR. b) Mitigation Measures. FEIR Mitigation Measure 7-3 (p. 7-40 of the DEIR) is hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. c) Findings. Based on the FEIR and the entire record before the City, the City Counci] finds that Mitigation Measure 7-3 would reduce the impacts on historic districts to a less than significant level because it would require each proposed S:IRESOI,UTif]NS\Reso. 2092 CEQA Pindings for DPP Exhibit B.doc �p 012011