My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-06-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-06-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:45:19 PM
Creation date
6/19/2003 1:23:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/23/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
&A- 25 <br />regards, and some options and recommendations as to how to proceed. He said the <br />Commission also received, under separate cover, a redlined version of each Ordinance, <br />which shows the specific changes to the existing language, and he informed them that <br />there are supporting graphics proposed for some of these regulations to help the reader <br />and the public better understand the proposed specifics. <br />Mr. Williams began his Power Point Presentation: <br />1. Arbors & Trellises <br />The purpose of the regulations for the arbors & trellises, and similar open structures, <br />is to provide revised standards for location and construction, while minimizing visual <br />impacts to neighbors and the public. <br />Proposed revisions regarding Arbors and Trellises: <br />➢ Definitions of "arbor" and "trellis" (Mr. Williams defined arbors as being detached <br />from the house, and trellis as being attached to the house.) <br />➢ Maximum heights <br />i Maximum encroachments into yards <br />➢ Exceptions for arbors at perimeters, usually integrated with fences /gates. <br />➢ Length not to exceed 30% of property line. <br />➢ Coverage not to exceed 5% of lot size. <br />He provided a diagram showing the regulations, and a couple of graphics <br />demonstrating what those would be, as well as a summary table, which will not be <br />incorporated into the Ordinance, but also will be used as a handout. <br />Chair Foust asked if he would rather use the overhead slide projector, and shut the <br />large screen down, due to malfunctioning. She thanked the audience for being <br />patient. <br />Mr. Williams continued with his presentation using the overhead slide projector. <br />2. Residential Heights <br />The purposes of these Amendments are to: <br />➢ reflect staffs current practice of measuring height (which differs in some respects <br />from the actual legality of the language that is in the Code); <br />> allow owners to finish "lower level" of existing structures (that may make it more <br />attractive, but right now is not allowed because the existing structure exceeds the <br />2 -1/2 story limitation); <br />> update definitions of the "story" and "half story", (so that they more reflect some <br />of the objectives of the 2-1/2 story height limit), and <br />➢ reduce the mass of new residences and additions. <br />Mr. Williams said one of the objectives is to address the number of on- hillside <br />structures, where you get a three story appearance to some of the buildings. This is <br />problematic for staff, especially on existing structures that would look better finished <br />out. <br />Page 3 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.