Laserfiche WebLink
This alternative will evaluate the facilities requirements and <br /> pipeline alignments to serve anticipated developments and other <br /> customers in the vicinity of Central Redwood City, including the <br /> downtown area, the Kaiser Campus and the Stanford Campus. <br /> • Alternative 2.B: (Expanded Infrastructure /Changed Policy) This <br /> alternative builds on Alternative 1.B and assumes the restriction <br /> on using recycled water where children play is removed. <br /> Therefore, as compared to Alternative 2.A, the customer base <br /> expands geographically to the west beyond the downtown area up <br /> to the elevation of approximately the Alameda de las Pulgas within <br /> the City limits. Several parks and schools will be added to the <br /> customer base of Alternative 2.A and additional water supply <br /> benefits will be derived for the cost of extended pipelines and <br /> other facilities. <br /> This subtask will address Items #48 and #49 of the UWMP Guidelines Checklist and <br /> portions of Tables 23 & 24 as described below. <br /> #48 Describe and quantify the potential uses of recycled water, including, but not limited to, agricultural <br /> irrigation, landscape irrigation, wildlife habitat enhancement, wetlands, industrial reuse, <br /> groundwater recharge, indirect potable reuse, and other appropriate uses, and a determination with <br /> regard to the technical and economic feasibility of serving those uses (10633(d)). <br /> a) Based on the existing recycled water use and planned recycled water projects, estimate <br /> the amount of recycled water that is projected to be used within the urban water supplier's <br /> service area over the planning horizon of the UWMP (Table 23). <br /> b) Discuss technical and economic feasibility of these projected uses, including the potential <br /> for the projects to be implemented. <br /> #49 Describe the projected use of recycled water within the supplier's service area at the end of 5, 10, <br /> 15, and 20 years, and a description of the actual use of recycled water in comparison to uses <br /> previously projected pursuant to this subdivision (10633(e)). <br /> a) From the urban water supplier's 2005 UWMP, provide the 2010 projected estimates of <br /> recycled water use. Compare those estimates to the actual 2010 recycled water use <br /> (Table 24). <br /> Subtask 3.3 - Financial Incentives <br /> This subtask will include a plan for financial incentives that are planned to be <br /> implemented by Redwood City in order to encourage the use of recycled water and the <br /> projected results of the incentives. <br /> This subtask will address Item #50 of the UWMP Guidelines Checklist and Table 25 as <br /> described below. <br /> #50 Describe the actions, including financial incentives, which may be taken to encourage the use of <br /> recycled water, and the projected results of these actions in terms of acre -feet of recycled water <br /> used per year (10633(0). <br /> a) Describe the approaches the urban water supplier is implementing or is planning to <br /> implement to increase or encourage the use of recycled water within its service area. At a <br /> minimum, discuss how financial incentives are being implemented. <br /> 13 of 15 3/22/2011 <br />