Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Oddstad meet to discuss this matter and report back --to- the - -Council at the next <br /> meeting. Motion seconded by Councilman Stout and carried. Mr. Wells asked that he <br /> or someone from his area be allowed to attend this meeting. <br /> AUTHORIZE SALE OF BONDS, PARKING DISTRICT NO. 1. City Attorney advised that there are <br /> two features in the Resolution that should be brought to the attention of the public: <br /> 1. The fact that cost of the project and the bonds to be issued would <br /> be in the amount of $1,250,000.00, whereas the original estimate was <br /> for $1,000,000.00 which amount had been authorized. <br /> 2. Resolution provides for bonds that are not callable. It was the <br /> feeling of some of the Council that some of the bonds, perhaps <br /> half, should be callable. <br /> City Attorney suggested that the Council look over the copy of the Resolution and <br /> next week adopt or change it as the Council sees fit. Councilman Jones moved that <br /> this be carried on the Agenda for one week,'seconded by Councilman Britschgi and <br /> carried. <br /> City Attorney presented Supplemental Report on Parking District No. 1 from City <br /> Engineer showing that the estimated cost of acquisition to total $600,000.00 <br /> Cost of Improvements 590,000.00 <br /> Contingencies and In- <br /> cidental Expenses 70,000.00 <br /> This report was filed. <br /> CITY ENGINEER REGARDING PG&E UTILITY POLES ON EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN BREWSTER AVENUE <br /> AND BROADWAY. Letter from City Engineer stated that Council had granted extension of <br /> time to June 15, 1955 for the relocation of existing wood poles on the east side <br /> of El Camino. PG&E advised they have been unable to secure the necessary easements <br /> for the relocation of services. City Attorney advised the Utility Company has the <br /> power of Eminent Domain. Councilman Granger moved that the matter be placed on the <br /> Agenda for July 5th, members of the Council in the meantime to contact property <br /> owners in an effort to secure easement. Motion seconded by Councilman Spillers and <br /> carried. <br /> Mr. Tessendorf inquired as to why the PG&E can't have their wires underground, and <br /> was informed that this is also the desire of the Council and at some future date <br /> all wiring will be underground. Motion carried. <br /> A. R. MOLTZEN, ATTORNEY, REQUESTING 30 DAY EXTENSION ON SIDEWALK REPAIRS. Letter from <br /> Mr. Moltzen, representing Mrs. Cora V. Schweinhsr d, owner of property on south- <br /> westerly corner of Lot 3, Block 3, of Redwood Industrial Tract No. 1, requesting <br /> extension during which time every effort will be made to work this matter out to <br /> the satisfaction of all concerned. City Engineer advised that this was brought <br /> about by the Ampex Corporation people who wanted the gap filled in, and that he had <br /> no objection to the extension of time. Councilman Royer moved that 30 days exten- <br /> sion be granted, seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. <br /> MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION LETTER REGARDING PROPOSED OPENING OF COUNCIL M•;ETINGS WITH PRAYER <br /> I/ OR DEVOTIONALS. Letter from this association was read in which they recommend opening <br /> each Council session with a brief prayer or devotional led by one of Redwood City's <br /> clergymen. Councilman Britschgi moved that this be approved, seconded by Councilman <br /> Stout. There was some discussion'regarding the possibility of alternating the <br /> various religious faiths. Motion carried. <br />