My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Minutes 1955
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955
>
Minutes 1955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2016 10:11:22 AM
Creation date
5/3/2011 4:30:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4? <br /> a letter from City Engineer Jain wherein he reported that they have completed plans <br /> for the improvement of Ebener Street, Poplar Avenue, and Lucerne Avenue, as directed <br /> by the City Council requested that plans be prepared to include the extension of <br /> Lucerne Avenue to Hess Road, although no petitions had been .received from property <br /> owners along the dedicated portion of Lucerne Avenue. It is realized that there is an <br /> existing residence across the proposed extension of Lucerne Avenue to Ebener Street. <br /> The Engineers are now in receipt of a petition signed by the owners of more than 75% <br /> of the frontage on the presently dedicated portion of Geneva Avenue, requesting full <br /> street improvements. Inasmuch as the extension of Geneva Avenue to Ebener Street <br /> would not require the removal of any existing structures, a decision should be made <br /> immediately as to whether Lucerne Avenue will be extended and improved, or Geneva <br /> Avenue substituted for it, or whether both streets should be continued and improved <br /> to Ebener Street. <br /> From the standpoint of drainage, and the construction of sanitary sewers, as well as <br /> the probable cost of acquisition of right -of -way, the Geneva Avenue extension would <br /> be the most desirable. The Engineering, Department requested that they be advised as <br /> to the desires of the Council so that assessment proceedings can either be initiated <br /> to conform to present plans, or so that revisions can be made to provide for the <br /> Geneva Avenue extension. <br /> In the discussion which followed, Councilman Hoyer explained that here will be a <br /> condemnation suit either way, Geneva or.Lucerne, and that the condemnation of Geneva <br /> would be for property only and would not include the building which would be the case <br /> if Lucerne property were condemned. Engineer Moen explained the - situation further. <br /> The, Engineering Department was not recommending which street should be used, but were <br /> presenting the case as it appears. <br /> After further discussion, Councilman Britschgi moved that they proceed with Geneva <br /> instead of Lucerne, seconded by Councilman Jones who added that the City Engineer be <br /> directed to bring'in plans for Geneva. Engineer Moen explained that there wasn't any <br /> petition for the improvement of Lucerne but there is now a petition forGeneva. <br /> Councilman Britschgi restated his motion, City Enginer to bring in plans and speci- <br /> fications for Geneva and eliminate Lucerne, and the City Auditor be authorized to <br /> advance funds fromthe General Fund, seconded by Councilman Jones and carried. <br /> Councilman Royer wanted to know how soon they could get the plans back so they could <br /> set a date for the openings of bids. A gentleman from the audience reported that they <br /> would not be able to get into their property this winter if something isn't done <br /> because of mud. The road into their property has just recently been dug up to put <br /> in a new water line. Councilman Royer moved that the City Engineer have the plans and <br /> specifications ready and back into the hands of the Council by the September 12th <br /> meeting, seconded by Councilman Granger and carried. <br /> REPORT ON BID OPENING, 4,000 FEET OF 12" CAST IRON PIPE. Water Superintendent Winter <br /> reported that the following bids were received: <br /> U. S. Pipe & Foundry Company $4.07 per lin. ft. $16,768.40 <br /> Delivery date 60 -75 days <br /> Pacific States Cast Iron <br /> Pipe Company 44.135 per lin. ft 417,036.20 <br /> Delivery date 110 days <br /> Water Superintendent Winter and City Manager Roliaon recommended that the law bid of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.