My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Minutes 1955
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955
>
Minutes 1955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2016 10:11:22 AM
Creation date
5/3/2011 4:30:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 be accepted and all other bids be rejected. Councilman Spillers <br /> U 9 <br /> amount of X67, 779.9 P rejected. <br /> offered RESOLUTION 1942 AWARDING CONTRACT TO O.C. JONES & SONS and moved adoption, <br /> seconded by Councilman Royer and carried on roll call, Councilman Britschgi being noted <br /> absent. <br /> REPORT CINNABAR COMMITTEE, COUNCILMAN GRANGER. Councilman Granger reported that the Committee <br /> was still studying the various offers and was not jumping to conslusions but endeavor- <br /> ing to get the best deal for the City. He stated that anyone interested from a mining <br /> standpoint would still be given a hearing but that a deadline must be met as the <br /> Committee must make their final report at the October 31st meeting. Councilman Granger <br /> stated that he had received a telegram from the Indian Monument Corporation as well as <br /> a communication regarding their bid. He then moved that the telegram and letter be <br /> seconded by Councilman Spillers ead and made a part of the record, eco y and carried. p 1 <br /> Telegram: Floyd L. Granger, Chairman. <br /> I am lead to believe that despite the clear fact our company bid on park <br /> mercury deposit is the more favorable to the City 'Treasury you Committee <br /> is critical of our financial statement and isposed to reject for that <br /> reason. It would appear to us that any apprehension you might have can <br /> be fully met by terms of performance bond. However in an effort to meet <br /> your presumed objections we have proposed a working arrangement with <br /> Messrs. Piggott and Dineley to support our bid with their full finances. <br /> I understand Piggott will confirm this arrangement in personal represent- <br /> ations to your committee. Should you have any question respectfully re- <br /> quest privilege of further hearing and discussion. <br /> G. A. Nugent, President Indian Monument Mining Corp. <br /> "Dear Sir: <br /> Recent news items appearing in the Tribune, relative to the Stulsaft <br /> Park mercury deposit, tend to give the erroneous impression that the <br /> interests of the Indian Monument Mining Company and the Piggott / Dineley <br /> group are allied. <br /> While such an association of interests was at one time contemplated it <br /> was never consumated, due to inability of the individuals concerned to <br /> agree on operating proceedure and, therefore, the activities of the <br /> Indian Monument Company are entirely independent. <br /> Very truly yours, <br /> rt. L. Dineley, <br /> Consolidated Industries of Calif. <br /> Councilman Granger reiterated the fact that the Committee would welcome the represent- <br /> ative from any mining organization, however, there must be a deadline to enable the <br /> Committee ro report at the next meeting. Mr. Dinely, who was in the audience, agreed <br /> to meet with the Committee Wednesday, October 26th, at 4 p.m. <br /> Councilman Granger commented on the survey recently made by the Engineering Department <br /> and it appears that from their report that the amount of material removed from City <br /> property is approximately that indicated in the report of Francis H. Frederick, mining <br /> geologist, or approximately 145 tons. It would appear that the amount offered by Mr. <br /> Oddstad, Jr., of ,500.00 is a fair settlement, and Councilman Granger then moved that <br /> the amount be accepted as full settlement, seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. <br /> FURTHER DISCUSSION ALLEN BROTHERS APPLICATION FOR 10' REAR YARD AND 9' GARAGE VARIANCE. <br /> II Final decision on this matter was held up for this meeting in order that Council could <br /> look over the situation. Councilman Royer moved approval of Planning Commission <br /> recommendation to allow variance, seconded by Councilman Spillers. Mrs. Davis, <br /> adjoining property owner on Redwood Avenue, again appeared stating her objections, <br /> however, after further discussion Councilman rtoyer amended his motion and offered <br /> RESOLUTION 1943 FOR VARIANCE TO ALLEN BROTHERS FOR 10' REAR YARD AND 9' GARAGE, 335 OAK <br /> AVENUE, and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried on roll call, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.