Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 6A <br /> Page 20 <br /> ............. Mr. Jolm B aer <br /> .Jill/limy 20, 2006 <br /> ......~ Page 10f4 <br /> As previously stated, traffic conditions at the study intersections and freeway segments were analyzed for the <br /> weekday AM and PM peak hours of traffic. The AM peak hour of traffic is generally between 7;00-and 9:.00 <br /> AM, and the PM peak hour is typically between 4:00 and 6:00 PM. It is during these periods that the most <br /> congested traffic conditions occur on an average weekday. Traffic conditions were evaluated for the following <br /> scenanos: <br /> Scenario 1: Existing Conditions. Existing intersection traffic volumes were obtained from new manual <br /> tuming-movement counts conducted at the study intersections. <br /> Scena rio 2: Background Conditions. Background traffic volumes were estimated by adding to existing <br /> intersection peak hour vohmles the projected volumes from approved but not yet completed <br /> developments in the project area. The added traffic from approved developments was <br /> collected from data contained in previous traffic studies supplied by the City of Redwood <br /> City. <br /> Scenario 3: Prf?ject Conditions. Projected intersection traffic volumes with the project were estimated <br /> by adding to background traffic volumes the traffic generated by each of the potential <br /> project altematives. Project conditions for each development altemative were evaluated <br /> relative to background conditions in order to detemline potential intersection impacts due to <br /> the project. <br /> Project Trip Generation <br /> The magnitude of traffic added to the roadway system by a particular development is estimated by applying <br /> the applicable trip generation rates to the size of the development. The trip generation rates that were used <br /> were from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) manual entitled Trip Generation, Seventh Edition, <br /> 2003. Trip generation was estimated for the otlice project altemative (Altemative 1) and the residential <br /> project altemative (Alternative 2). There is an existing 60,000 sJ. office building on site that will be removed <br /> as part of the project. TIle office building has been vacant for over four years. Therefore, trip credits were not <br /> given for the existing building. <br /> Office Project Alternative <br /> On the basis of the ITE rates, it is estimated that 80,000 s.f. of office space would generate 1,123 daily trips, <br /> with 157 trips during the AM peak hour and 168 trips during the PM peak hour. Using the specified inbound / <br /> outbound splits. the office space would produce 138 inbound trips and 19 outbound trips during the AM peak <br /> hour, and 29 inbound trips and 140 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. <br /> Residential Project Alternative <br /> On the basis of the ITE rates, it is estimated that 100 residential units would generate 642 daily trips, with 52 <br /> trips during the AM peak hour and 60 trips during the PM peak hour. Using the specified inbound / outbound <br /> splits, the residential development would produce 9 inbound trips and 43 outbound trips during the AM peak <br /> hour, and 40 inbound trips and 20 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. <br /> Table I shows the project trip generation estimates for both the office and residential project altematives. <br /> ---" <br />