Laserfiche WebLink
�A��9 <br /> � <br /> G. Emeraencv Access Imaacts <br /> � Potential Impact: The Project may conflict with RCFD standards for road <br /> design as further described in Impact 10-7. Until tentative maps are available for <br /> review, the existen :e of this confl, :t cannot be assessed. <br /> Mitigat�on: The City �hall review and approve any proposed subdivision <br /> map for the Project, and the applicant shall demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that <br /> the Project complies with all applicable City and RCFD road design and emergency <br /> access standards or such alternative standards as the City may determine are feasible <br /> and will not impair emergency response. <br /> Findings: The mitigation measure identified above is feasible and <br /> reduces the potentially significant environmental impact described above to a less-than- <br /> significant IeveL <br /> H. Parks and Recreation Services Impacts <br /> Potential impact: The Project will increase demand for local parks and <br /> recreational services; approximately 6.8 acres of additionai improved parkland or other <br /> equivalent area would be required to maintain the City's current ratio of 1.7 acres of <br /> parkland per 1,000 residents (Impact 10-8). <br /> Mitigation: The Parks, Recreation and Community Services <br /> _ Development Strategic Plan (the "Strategic Plan") referred to in the FEIR as being <br /> formulated by the City has not been adopted prior to this resolution and the City has <br /> determined that under the circumstances, the requirements of the Strategic Plan shall <br /> not apply to the Project. The Precise Plan for the Project reflects relevant City <br /> departments' determination of the standards by which to evaluate the project appiicanYs <br /> plans for parks and recreation services. Applying those standards, the conventional <br /> parks, espianades, marina and other park areas within the Project are equal to a ratio of <br /> at least 1.9 acres per thousand anticipated residents—the existing ratio of parkland <br /> within the City with Redwood Shores excluded (Mitigation 10-8). <br /> Findings: Application of the Precise Plan requirements to the Project is <br /> feasible and reduces the potentially significant impact on availability of parkland and <br /> park and recreation services described above to a less-than-significant level. <br /> I. Solid Waste Diversion Impacts <br /> Potential Impact: The Project may fail to meet state-mandated <br /> requirements for solid waste stream diversion. Site and project plans developed to date <br /> do not provide enough detail to determine if adequate recycling provisions have been <br /> included in the Project design (Impact 10•9). <br /> Mitigation: The final architectural design for the Project shall include <br /> chutes for recyclable materials immediately adjacent to the garbage chutes or at other <br /> – suitable locations approved by the City in the residential towers. Bins for storage of <br /> 1289\02\t792782 29 <br /> Atty/ResWReso.1470 <br /> 052004 <br />