My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-05-24
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-05-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 3:52:54 PM
Creation date
5/20/2004 4:23:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
5/24/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
��- f� 5 <br /> Xlil. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS <br /> Implementation of the proposed Project in conjunction with other City- <br /> approved projects would have a significant, unavoidable cumulative impa�t on <br /> population, housing, and employment; on trans�ortation and circulation; on <br /> infrastructure and public services and on air quality. These impacts are discussed m�re <br /> fully in Sections III, IV, VII and XII, above. <br /> The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project <br /> override the significant cumulative impacts of the proposed Project, as more fully stated <br /> in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. <br /> XIV. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES <br /> The FEIR describes a range of nine reasonable altematives which would <br /> further avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects of the Project , and <br /> evaluates the merits of these alternatives. The City has determined that the Initial <br /> Project shouid be modified to incorporate key elements of Altemative 6, as described in <br /> the FEIR, because such modifications will reduce overall environmental impacts and <br /> provide other public benefits. Incorporating only key elements of Altemative 6, as <br /> opposed to adopting Alternative 6, will not prevent the Project from achieving ks <br /> fundamental goals in a way that renders the Project infeasible. The City has also <br /> determined that none of the identified alternatives is feasible, for the reasons described <br /> — below and in the FEIR. <br /> A. No-Proiect Alternative <br /> Qescription: The "No ProjecY' Alternative assumes that the Project would <br /> not be developed and the Project site would remain in its present condition. <br /> Findings: The No Project Alternative would avoid the significant and <br /> potentially significant environmental effects of the Project. However, the No Project <br /> Alternative would fail to achieve any of the basic objectives of the Project. These <br /> objectives are identified in Section 3.3 and Table 17.11 of the FEIR: <br /> • Create a mixed use residential-office-retail project that responds <br /> to perceived future market demands for more residential <br /> purchase and office lease opportunities in the Mid-Peninsula, <br /> convenient to an existing downtown, a major interregional <br /> transit corridor, and local job centers; <br /> . Provide primarily residential uses, with complementary <br /> commercial, retail, and other community-serving uses; <br /> • Create the project as a high�qu�lity Bayfront development <br /> providing a variety of housing options in order to address the <br /> i28s�o2�nsz�a.z 35 <br /> Atty/Reso/Reso.1470 <br /> 052004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.