AgdaPkt 2004-05-24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

�� - 3q � Findings: Mitigation 7-3 is feasible and will help to partially mitigate _,�' Impact 7-3. However, mitigation of this impact to a less-than-significant level would require the addition of another southbound through lane to the freeway segment, which is not feasible be�ause this freeway widening would require multiple approvals from multiple jurisdictions beyond the authority of the City and would require resources beyond the capacity of any individ4al development project or the City. Therefore, the effect of the Project on this freeway segment during the AM peak hour is a significarrt unavoidable impact. D. Proiect Impact on Westbound SR 84. Counri Line to Universitv Avenue and Universitv Avenue to Willow Road Seaments — AM Peak Hour Potential Impact: The Project is expected to increase traffic volumes by more than one percent of capacity on Westbound SR 84, County Line to University Avenue and University Avenue to Willow Road during the AM peak hour, a period during which these segments already operate at an unacceptable level of service (Impact 7-4). Mitigation: The Project shall be required to implement a TDM program meeting the criteria set forth in Mitigation 7-2 (Mitigation 7-4). Findings: Mitigation 7� is feasible and will help to partially mitigate Impact 7-4. However, mitigation of this impact to a less-than-sign�cant level would — require the addition of another westbound through lane to both freeway segments, which is not feasible because this freeway widening would require multiple approvals from multiple jurisdictions beyond the authority of the City and would require resources beyond the capacity of any individual development project or the City. Therefore, the effect of the Project on this freeway segment during the AM peak hour is a sign�cant unavoidable impact. E. Proiect Impact on U.S. 101 Southbound Mixed-Flow Lanes. Whiaale Avenue to Woodside Road Seqment — PM Peak Hour Potential Impact: The Project is expected to increase traffic volumes by more than one percent of the U.S. 101 Southbound Mixed-Flow Lanes, Whipple Avenue to Woodside Road segmenYs capacity during the PM peak hour, a period during which traffic volume already exceeds capacity (Impact 7-5). Mitigation: The project applicant shall design and implement a TDM program meeting the criteria set forth in Mitigation 7-2 (Mitigation 7-5). Findings: Mitigation 7-5 is feasible and wiil help to partially mitigate Impact 7-5. However, mitigation of this impact to a less-than-significant level would require the addition of another southbound through lane to the freeway segment, which is not feasible because this freeway widening would require multiple approvals from multiple jurisdictions beyond the authority of the City and would require resources — beyond the capacity of any individual development project or the City. Therefore, the 1289\02�179278.2 9 AtlylResolReso.1470 � 052004